"I Think Chairman Mao's Picture On The White House Tree Is Okay."

"If you do, you are truly ignorant or demented. Chairman Mao unleased hordes of teenagers on teachers, doctors, intellectuals, journalists, and anyone else who looked educated or sophisticated. These crazy kids slaughtered millions. Then he insituted a bizarre back-to-the-earth reform in which the people were marched out of their cities and towns and herded into the rural areas. Many more millions starved to death. Fifty to one hundred million innocent human beings died because of Mao. For the Obamas to put his picture on a Christmas ball and hang it in the White House, proves once again that they are Insane Children. Barack Obama must be stopped! We must find a leader who is standing up to this communist. Look around you. Who is speaking out against him voluntarily? I'm not going to ask Sarah Palin to do it. If it doesn't come from her gut, her convictions, her principles and on its own, I'm not going to ask for it. We have to find someone who is speaking out now and support him or her immediately. Please let me know if you have anyone in mind. Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850.

"I Think Redistibution Of Income Is Good"

Answer: "Then you must think that stealing is good. The word "redistribution" should not be used by honest people. Leave it to the lying liberals to use. When you go to work and earn money, you are earning money. It is not being distributed to you. "Redistribution" should not be used. Instead you should say, ' The government seized our earned money and then distributed it to the minorities." What is "government?" Government is made up of corrupt, prostituting, arrogant politicians and their federal, state, and local workers who are usually just as corrupt, prostituting, and arrogant as the politicians. There are beloved exceptions to this generalization such as Senator Jim Demint, but exceptions are rare. It is time that white men rediscovered their manhood and stood for principles rather than more sex and more toys. How long must you remain adolescents? Now if I were important, the lying liberals would immediately embark upon a journey to prove I was no man. They would find things I have done wrong and done badly.I am OK with that because I don't think being a man means being perfect. It is impossible for human beings to be perfect, and although I have done many things badly, I have done relatively few things that you could formally 'wrong,' in the aspect of laws or morals. We are all sinners. It is just a matter of degrees. Stand and be counted, white men! You have done more for this world than any other group. Be proud of it! Two Guns at 352-359-0850.

Arguement #32 "The Civil Rights Act of '64 Helped Blacks So Much!"

"No, it didn't, not economically. Blacks already had a definite upward trend in income and occupations that had begun decades earlier. After the passage of the Civil Rights Act that progress simply continued. There was no acceleration of progress due to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In fact the rise of blacks into professional and other high-level jobs was less, mark that -was less- after the passage of the Civil Rights Act than it was in the years preceding the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In fact, it was at a higher rate in the '40s than in the '50s. The reason for this was that blacks were closing the education gap between themselves and the whites. See Thomas Sowell's book,"Black Rednecks And White Liberals," page 51. Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850.

Arguement #31 "There's No Healthcare Rationing Planned!"

I am admittedly short on names but an orthopaedic surgeon on Fox said less than an hour ago that there is a rationing council already quietly ensconced in the Stimulus Bill. The good doctor said that President Killed-Newborns-In-Illinois Obama has already appointed seven members to the council, and a building for them is being sought. If this is true, you won't hear about on the Liberal partisan news networks. You will have to go to Fox or the radio talk shows. The doctor read a quote supposedly from the Stimulus Bill that said these seven cruel, brown-shirts were supposed to "guide" doctors in their medical treatment. You know what that means - cap expenditures, that is, ration medical care. The slavers will be telling your doctor how much he can "spend" on your health care. If this is actually in the Stimulus Bill, it will be another example of Obama's lying by omission. Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850.

Arguement #31 "Michelle Obama Didn't Lose Law License!"

The only thing I know about this I learned last Friday on "The Michael Savage Show." Savage had a guest who seemed to be a Redneck Black preacher. You know the type: loud and bombastic. He claimed that Michelle Obama was involved in some civil rights violation and turned in her law license to the bar association as part of a deal to avoid prosecution. Supposedly when a New York Times reporter asked her about it during hubby's campaign she claimed she did it because she had so many other things to do. That was enough for the reporter,probably a partisan Demonrat himself, and he apparently put one hand over his eyes and the other hand over his mouth and never pursued the topic. That's hard to believe but so was the campaign of President Tortures-Newborns-To-Death Barack Obama. This gentleman who sounded like a black minister also said that the only person alive who remembers Barack's birth is his paternal grandmother, and she says he was born in Kenya. Obama is a fairly young man. Surely there are other people still alive who remember his birth and can tell you where he was born. Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850.

Arguement #30 "There Are No Death Panels!"

There is a death panel provision in the Bacaus "health care" bill. It is that physicians will lose five percent (for now) of their salary if they provided more medical care that the limit set by the Almighty State for seniors. This will be the first time doctors have to ration their care to seniors and marks the beginning of seniors being treated like objects instead of human beings. If Obama will vote in Illinois to kill by neglect new-born babies born in spite of an abortion attempts, he wil move to kill old people who are even less useful to the State than newborns. Get your crosses out, Christians! Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850.

Arguement #29 "Obama Cares About Health Care"

Obama does not care about health care. If he did, he wouldn't be supporting socialized health care that in every nation that has it provides poor care and has forty percent of their hospitalized patients suffering from malnutrition. If Obama cared about health care, he would have talked about it in Masssachusetts. Why did he remain silent about socialized health care in a state that already has socialized health care? Because Masssachusett's socialized health care is costing about $1 billion dollars this year instead of the promised $150 million. Just a slight difference! He didn't not want the media focusing on socialized health care in Massachusetts because it has been a huge failure. What Obama cares about in health care is forcing you and me around and then when we are too old to be "useful" to the State, he is interested in using death panels to determine when we should be put to death. If Obama had cared about health care for individuals, he would not have vote to neglect babies born in Illinois in spite of abortion attempts and to ignore them until they died. This man does not care about your life or my life. He cares about his immediate family and making the State into a monster that kills "unwanted" babies and "useless" senior citizens. That is why I say that Christians might consider holding a cross between them and Obama if they ever find themselves in his presence. Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850.

Arguement #28 "Obama's Not Recognizing The Berlin Wal"

I've heard it twice today including once from a English Lord : Obama's not sending a delegation to represent the United States at the anniversary commemoration of the fall of the Berlin Wall. As the English Lord commented, "This says it all." But why would a communist celebrate the fall of the Berlin Wall? The fall of the wall meant that Communist Russia was no longer able to fence all its prisoners out of freedom. For years individuals had risked their lives going under and over the wall. If they failed, they were shot by the East German border guards. Indviduals would risk death - and most attempts ended in death - to escape the horrors of communism. Obama would hardly celebrate that. He wants America to be imprisoned in his communist state. He is busy destroying our economy to bring us to our knees. On our knees we will beg him to take care of us. He will take care of us. Just like he took care of the economy. I don't understand why people are not clutching a cross when they are in his presence! Are there no Chrisitans near him? Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850.

Arguement #27 "America Spends Too Much Money On Health Care!"

What is "too much money?" For you or for the patient getting care? Does he think too much money is being spent on him? If you were in the hospital, would you think too much money was being spent on you? Can't you see that is why every elite Democrat from Obama down is going to keep his special health insurance if nationalized health care is enacted? Obama and his gang of insane children do not plan to be treated by nationalized health care. They will keep their gold-plated health care. Yes, other developed countries with national health care do spend less than America, but the citizens don't get as good care. If they are elderly, they may get no care except for pain killers if they're lucky. Yes, these countries spend less money on health care than we do and so does Sudan. Want to go to any of these places for health care? Of course not! And the people in those places come to America for health care if they can afford it. What a silly arguement! Anyone knows that generally you get what you pay for. The more you pay, generally, the better you get. Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850.

Arguement #26 "There's No Rationing Of Drugs In Government Health Care."

No, there is rationing of drugs in nationalized health care. Britain has a government agency that limits people's acess to the latest and the most effective drugs. This government agency is, of course, named the opposite of what it does. It's called The National Institute For Health And Clinical Effectiveness. It is not interested in your health and clinical effectiveness; it is interested in saving the government money. The agency decides what drugs you don't get because they are too "expensive." This is rationing plain and simple. Between 1998 and 2002, we in the United States because of private heath care instead of public health care enjoyed 85 new drugs to help us with our physical and mental problems. Of those 85 new drugs, the people in Europe saw only 44 of them because of government health care. The Democrats are not ineterested in health care except as a vehicle to force you to march to their tunes even if it means misery and an early death. The Democrats don't care. It's about force over you not health care. They want to make a slave of you and kill you slowly. This is why the Swedes with their government medical care are so desperate that they go to veterinarians because doctors aren't allowed to see them. Don't let these insane children rule you. Oppose government health care as loudly as you can. Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850.

Arguement #25 People All Over The World Love Government-Run Health Care

Your response: "Then take a look at where the Italian Prime Minister, Silvio Berlusconi, went when he needed heart surgery. He went to the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio which is widely known to the best hospital in America for cardiac treatment. Remember all those wonderful "free" hospitals in Paris and London that Michael Moore rhapsodized about in his movie, "Sicko"? Did the good prime minister of Italy choose any of these government-run hospitals when he needed help? No, he chose an American non-government hospital. By non-governement, I mean he wouldn't have chosen a VA hospital either. Also when Canadian Parliament Member Belinda Stronach had breast cancer did she honor President Barack Obama's lie that "Canadians are perfectly happy with their health care"? No, she went to a California hospital. This was in 2007.
At the risk of Sally Pipes writing me that I am re-printing her book, let me cite her book, "The Top Ten Myths in American Health Care" again. See pages 137-8. Peter Nickerson at 352-359-0850.

Arguement 24 "Patients Undernourished In Government-Run Hospitals?

"I just can't believe that, Two-Guns! Obama wants us to follow in the foodsteps of government -run health care, and in Britain up to 40% of the patients in their hospitals receive such horrible care that they are actually undernourished! Who said that?"
"Lisa (the Liberal), I am glad that you are not just blankly accepting everything I say. I wish you would do the same with the lying Liberals. Yes, that statement was made by Britain's Malnutrition Advisory Group. Britain's government-run hospitals are in utter disrepair. To begin with ,each year the government cancels stops around 100,000 operations. About 100,000 people get illnesses and infections in government-run hospitals that they didn't come in with. Do you remember the heat wave in 2003 that killed 15,000 seniors in France? The reason that happened is that there wasn't room in the hospitals for them. Personally, I wonder if they weren't triaged out of the hospitals on the basis that they were a "drag" on society since they didn't work any more and pay taxes. I would like to know if that's the real reason they couldn't get into hospitals. See ,your family and friends love you, but the State looks upon you as either an asset in that you pay taxes to it or a liability in that you don't pay taxes. It's even worse if you're old, because that is when you have to see doctors a lot and therefore use up a lot of the Medicaid money. There's no love in government despite the snow jobs candidates for office give you when they're running for office. Just try to see and talk to them after they're elected. Why then they're royalty, and you're nothing but a dumb peasant. All you'll get from them is condescension. Talking about government treating you like a dumb peasant, in Sweden it's worse than that. People are getting treated like dogs."
"What do you mean?" asks Lisa. "Surely you're not being literal!"
"Actually I am. In Sweden, the government-run health care is so horrible and the waits so long, that desperate people have gone to veterinarians for medical care. Swedes needing heart surgery have to wait as long as 25 weeks for heart surgery. That's six months, Lisa. In non-government hospitals here in America, I've heard of doctors finding something wrong with the heart of a patient at their private offices and driving the patient themselves to the hospital for immediate heart surgery."
"Where are you getting all your facts from, Two-Guns?"
"Most of them come from Sally Pipes' book, "The Top Ten Myths In American Health Care."That reminds me, did I make it clear yesterday that the liberals who are slavers are simply projecting onto Rush Limbaugh their own slavery? They don't want to admit to us dumb peasants that they are trying to enslave us by creating laws that will force us to do as they want us to do in every aspect of our life. So they say that Rush Limbaugh supports slavery- not them, of course. Like I say - lying Liberals."
"You make it very difficult for me to be a Liberal, Two-Guns."
"Lisa, you are living proof that Liberals are irrational."
Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850.

Arguement 23 "Rush Limbaugh Supports Slavery?"

The Liberal position: " Two-Guns, did you hear that Rush Limbaugh was accused of supporting slavery and therefore shouldn't be eligible to buy the Rams? I know you listen to him all the time."
The Ayn Rand, Liberterian, Conservative Republican reply: " Yeah Lisa, I heard about it, and except for the lying viciousness of it, I find it amusing in a detached way. The first defense mechanism of collectivists or Liberals is lying. That's why I refer to them as lying Liberals often.
But not as often as they lie. The second defense mechanism Liberals use is projection. Calling Rush a slaver is projection. Projection is when you have something inside you that you are uncomfortable with so you place or project it upon others and then attack it there. On others, not yourself. You know that I make it clear that what Liberals and all collectivists want is the ability to use force on you to make you do the things they want you to do, not what you want to do. What Liberals and all collectivists want is slavery for everyone except themselves, of course.
A couple of days ago, I heard someone calling into a major talk show host and telling him, Neal Boortz it was, that someone important has used the term "force" to explain what the Obama Administration was using on us. Neal said he was heartened to hear that as that is his major criticism of political parties but especially the Democrats - they use force through the laws passed to make individuals do things they don't want to and shouldn't have to. The liberals know that more people are seeing through their game and fear they will eventually realize that they are modern day slavers. They don't use the whip, but laws to force you and me around and make us work for free because more and more of our money is being taken by the government through taxes and given to "more deserving" people.

Arguement 22: " You Lie, Michelle Obama, Again?"

The Liberal Position: "What do you mean Michelle Obama lied again about health care? Are you on the side of terrorists like some of the Democrats in the news are asking Republicans?'
The Ayn Rand, Liberterian, Conservative Republican Answer: "No, Lisa, my Liberal friend, telling you a fact about Michelle Obama is not being on the side of the terrorists. The terrorists lie. In fact, there is a Muslim term, for lying on behalf of Islam. Christianity has no such perversion. Islam is an imperialistic religion. Christianity is not. The Obamas are far more on the side of terrorists than I am because the Obamas would never say what I have just said about Islam. I have been telling you that the Liberal Democrats are evil-sick, and it's time you began believing me as I have been piling up examples. I'm beginning to wonder if you only have a primitive mind that uses only emotions. You are supposed to have a logical mind on top of your primitive mind. Maybe you never grew one like the Liberal Democrats."
"But Two-Guns, how can you say such a hateful thing about Michelle Obama - that she lied about health care?"
"Because it is true, Grasshopper. "
"How's that?"
"That's bettter. I will tell you. Michelle Obama used to work for the very hospital she took her daughter Sasha to . She was on unpaid leave during the campaign from that hospital during her husband's presidential campaign, and I don't know what her status is with that hospital now that she is in the White House. But do you know what her job was at that hospital in Chicago?"
"No, what?"
"Her job was to legally find a way to turn uninsured people away from the hospital emergency center. These were probably mainly poor people who had no money either."
" She worked to turn the uninsured away from medical care?"
"Yes. Instead of letting them get the best medical care around at the hospital emergency room, she devised a way to make them go to Medicaid mills, clinics, and other hospitals."
"How could she justify such a horrible thing?"
" She publicly justified it by saying that the hospital wanted to concentrate on serious illnesses such as cancer. Any hospital could say that."
"I can't believe it! My feeling brain is overwhelmed with emotions!"
"Hang in there, Lisa, the Liberal! When Michelle Obama gets the chance to make some big bucks, she'll turn people away from top drawer medical care. When Michelle Obama gets the chance to gain the power to force people to receive low-grade medical care through nationalized medical care, she's all about the poor and uninsured getting medical care. But she doesn't tell them that it's poor medical care, and that she's not going to be a part of it. She'll have a different kind of medical care as the President's wife for the rest of her life. She talks out of both sides of
her mouth. She does not care about people. She cares about forcing people to do whatever she wants them to do. She forces them through laws that the corrupt, evil-sick Liberal Democrats in the Senate and the House don't even read before they vote for them. Peter Nickerson MS, MSW at 352-359-0850. PS. The shunting of uninsured people away from the Chicago hospital emergency room was done at the University of Chicago Medical Center. The process of turning uninsured people away was gloriously called the Urban Health Initiative. It began in 2007.

Arguement 21: "'You Lie, Michelle!'? This Better Be Good!"

The Liberal Position: "What in the world do you mean that the First Lady of the United States of America lied? This is ridiculous and maybe subversive! This better be good or I just might call the White House! I heard her speech, and she sounded so sincere and earnest about health care! My God, she was talking about taking her daughter Sasha to the emergency room! What can you possibly fault about that? You Republicans really do have an extra Y chromosome like we Democrates said years ago!Everyone, just like Michelle and Sasha, should be able to go to the emergency room for treatment!"
The Ayn Rand, Liberterian, Conservative-Republican Arguement: "Lisa, my libelous, liberal friend, you have put your finger on the 'You Lie, Michelle.' Mrs. Obama did give the impression that you needed health insurance to go the emergency room. She said something like, "I was so glad that we had health insurance!" The lie is that you need health insurance to get emergency room treatment. You don't have to, and you haven't had to since 1986 when the Emergency Room and Active Labor Act was passed. By that law, all hospitals that receive any public money are required to treat everyone. Everyone, Lisa, not just those with health insurance. It doesn't matter if you have medical coverage. It doesn't matter if you're not an an American citizen. It doesn't matter if you are in America illegally and about to blow up one of our skyscrapers. Anyone, anywhere in the world must be treated in our emergency rooms. If you can get here, the emergency room will treat you. I want to be fair and balanced here, Lisa. If Michelle Obama had said she felt better knowing that she had health insurance and was a paying customer, I would have had no problem. But this is not what she said, and as a lawyer, she is very capable of saying what she means. So the 'You lie, Michelle!' is justified.
Lisa, you are very emotional. You need to watch out for those who sound so earnest and sincere because, more often than not, they are the ones who are lying. They are using emotions, not facts, to sell you a lie. Don't buy into anything on an emotional basis. The barbarian's mind runs on pure emotion. Don't be a barbarian, Lisa. That's what you sounded like a few minutes ago."
Lisa: "I'm sorry. I just felt so upset when I heard you saying Michelle Obama lied. There's nothing wrong with feelings!"
Two-Guns: "Think first, Lisa, and when you've thought it through as much as you can, then feel. Don't go around feeling all the time. That's what a barbarian does."
Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850.

Arguement 20: " What? 'You Lie!' #3?"

The Liberal Position: "What do you mean - Obama lied again. I can't believe it! My Obama!"
My Ayn Rand, Liberterian, Conservative- Republican Arguement: "Lisa, I heard it myself. Rush Limbaugh was playing a part of Obama's appearance on the David Letterman Show. Obama said something like: 'The people in Canada are perfectly happy with their health care.' I could not believe my ears! And the crowd cheered that statement! I cannot understand it, Lisa. I have heard and read over and over again about Canadians being very unhappy with the long, long waits for doctors, especially specialists. I have heard about Canadians coming to America for medical care including cutting-edge drugs they couldn't get in Canada. I have heard that there's a demand for nurses in Canada because the medical care sucks, and nurses are getting out. Just a week ago, my mother who lives in North Idaho told me that they have a lot of Canadian doctors who have left Canada because of the government health care. I can't believe Letterman's audience hadn't heard and read the same things. Was the audience ignorant or did Obama just have them mesmerized by his flowery speech like a rattlesnake hyponotizes an innocent bird so he can swallow it? No, the crowd must have been Obama plants who would have cheered and then gulped Jim Jones flavored Kool-Aid if Obama asked them to.
Obama must stop lying. It is very disrespectful to us, and one day he like Peter may yell "Wolf," and no one will believe him. But Obama, as a Communist, is a collectivist. He is anti-individual, which means he is not for you as a person, but he is interested in structure like groups, classes, and most of all, The State. He does not see you and me as individuals with sacred rights. He sees us as resources for the Almighty State. This is collectivism, and collectivism has a long history. It goes back to men such as Rousseau, Nietzsche, and Heidigger. These men were philosophers who believed that honesty was unimportant in your quest to gain power.
Power was the ability to force people to do things you wanted them to do. Ultimately, these three philosophers, like Obama, were slavers. However, in the real world lying is a sickness, and I pray that Obama will get well before he gets worse."
Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850. PS. Today, I heard Rush Limbaugh say twice that Obama was being disrespectful toward us. This is the point I made yesterday in my last post. Is Rush reading me? I will know if he uses the term "slaver" to describe Obama or any other collectivist. That's a term I've never heard from the media.

Arguement 19 "Another 'You Lie!' Obama Impeached?"

The Liberal Position: Lisa, your Liberal Friend screams, "What do you mean- Obama made another lie in the health care address to Congress? What do you mean- he should be impeached?"
The Ayn Rand, Liberterian, Conservative Republican Arguement: "Yes, Lisa, Obama lied again about health care in that speech to Congress. He made another "You lie!"
He said that "buying insurance on your own costs you three times as much as the coverage you get from your employer." He used the same words later in Minneapolis when he was putting down "the marketplace." The marketplace is simply the processs in which you and every other individual is free to buy or barter for what you want and can pay for. Communists are against you being freee. The State (Obama) will tell you what to do. Obama is a communist. Hence, Obama's sneer at the marketplace. Obama lied again about health care because the Congressional Budget Offfice (CBO) compared employee-paid health insurance to individually paid health insurance. It stated, "Premiums purchased in the individual market are much lower- about one-third
lower for single coverage and half that level for family policies." This was reported in the Wall Street Journal. In other words, you as an individual can get health care coverage at much cheaper rates than your employer can. Anywhere from 33 to 50 percent cheaper. Not three times or 300 percent more expensive as Obama said.
Thus, Obama lied at least two times in his health care speech to Congress.
Lisa, we cannot tolerate a President who has such disprespect for us that he lies to us. That is why I said impeachment has to be kept in mind. Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850. PS. Saturday, I wore my shirt that has a picture of Obama on it with the caption "Worst President" over the picture. I was meeting a Navy Seal so I thought I'd be safe wearing it. But I first stopped for gas, and as I paid for it in a rough, country store, a Liberal snarled, "So I guess you liked Bush?"
"No. He was too liberal for me," I replied mildly.
"Idiot!" he spat and walked out of the store.
I finished paying at the same time and walked out behind him, saying, "Thank you for your foul mouth. You must be a Democrat."
"I am, and I'm proud of it," he called back as we went in different directions to our vehicles.
"Yeah, you people use force to make us do everything!" I countered, keeping my anger on a very short leash and trying to remain detached.
No reply. A reply would have necessitated too much intellect for this guy and most Liberal Democrats.

Arguement #18 "Health Care Is A Right!"

The Liberal Position: Lisa, your Liberal friend, says, "I don't know what all the fuss is about health care! It's our right! Everyone knows that!"
The Arguement from an Ayn Rand, Liberterian, Conservative Republican: "No, Grasshopper, health care is not a right. Any time you require another person to work for you at the point of a gun, you are not exercising a right. You are exercising force. When you force a person to work for you, you are engaged in slavery. You are a slaver. What you are doing is morally wrong as well as illegal in America. But with the growth of the Welfare State, slavery has been growing incrementally since the presidency of Franklin Roosevelt. Now socialized health care threatens to destroy the finest health care in the world and destroy America's position as the leader, by far, of new, cutting-edge drugs. It also threatens to withhold medical care from seniors. The supporters of health care, dear Lisa, are nothing but sick slavers." Peter Nickerson MS, MSW at 352-359-0850.
PS. Did you see the column by New York Times writer, Maureen Dowd, in which she said that when Joe Wilson yelled out, "You lie!" to Obama, she knows he meant "You lie, boy!" How does Maureen Dowd know that? Does she know what the lottery numbers are for tonight's Florida Powerball? Please call me, Maureen! As I said, Liberal Democrats are sick slavers. Slavery, yours and mine, is what is on their mind as they use the force of the almighty vote against us to take more and more of our money and freedom away from us. Slavery is so much on Liberal Deomocrat Maureen Dowd's mind, that when Joe Wilson yells something, she projects onto him a slave term:"boy." No, we're not slaves yet, Maureen, but I know you're working hard on it.

Arguement #17 "I Can't Believe That Wilson Guy!"

The Liberal Position: " I can't believe that Wilson guy, A Republican, yelling like that during Obama's health care speech! Really!"
The Ayn Rand, Liberterian, Conservative Republican Arguement: " Congressmen Joe Wilson of South Carolina finally did what so many of us have been asking our Republican politicians to do for a long time: Show some backbone. Jesus was not a chump, and neither should they be! Joe Wilson sat on a committee that saw the liberal Democrats beat back two attempts to include American citizenship as a requirement for receiving American health care. What are the liberals proposing- that American taxpayers finance health care for the world? They really do want to break America, don't they, Lisa (the Liberal)? Repeat, the Liberals opposed the citizenship requirement twice. Therefore, when President Obama stood in front of both houses of Congress and denied that health care would be open to anyone who applied regardless of where he was from, Representative Joe Wilson had the manhood to yell, "You lie!" He was right, and Obama was lying. Obama is the one who should be apologizing for having lied to Congress and the American people. Since when do you apologize to a liar for having pointed out his lie? Not in America, baby! It's a shame Joe folded so fast and apologized to Congress for his outburst. I would not have. Let them cite me for pointing out one of many of Obama's lies. I would frame the citation and give it the place of honor in my congressional office. Let Congress try to do anthing more to me. The lying Liberals wanted to shut down Joe and send a message to anyone else who wants to be honest. The Liberal Democrats are corrupt, sick people. I hope Americans have the guts to pick up Joe Wilson's banner and yell, "You lie!" the next time Obama disrespects them by telling them a lie. Let's get some guts, Americans." Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850.

Arguement #16 " Obama's School Speech Was Wonderful!"

The Liberal Position: Your friend, Lisa the Liberal, exclaims: "Did you hear Obama's speech to the school kids yesterday? It was wonderful! I sat there and drank Jim Jones Kool-Aid and loved it!"
The Ayn Rand, Liberatarian, Conservative Republican Arguement: "Lisa, first of all, I understand that Obama administration did not even talk to the school boards about televising his speech into their schools. It went directly to the principals and the teachers. If this is true, it was wrong. The school boards run the school system not the principals and the teachers. If true, this was more ignorance or arrogance from the Obama administration. Take your pick, there's plenty of both in the Obama administration.
Before I listened to his speech to the school kids, I told myself that I'd stop listening as soon as he said something I strongly disagreed with. I made that promise out of respect to my blood pressure. Lisa, yes, I did hear things that I agreed with such as hard work, self-reliance, and being realistic about becoming a professional basketball or football player. These are all conservative ideas, not liberal ones with the exception of working hard. That the liberal would love for you to do if you were working hard and long for the state while Obama was sitting up at the White House eating $100 a pound steak. Liberals do not want you working hard for yourself, but for the government. The politicians think they have the right to take your money and spend it the way they want to. They have become very brazen parasites!
But when Obama said that if a student drops out of school, he hurts not only himself but the United States, I left the room as I had promised my blood pressure. Lisa, we are free people. We are not here to serve the United States government or live up to its expectations. If I am sixteen and drop out of school, the only people I may hurt are my parents and myself. I have no obligation to the parasites that will suck my money and liberty the rest of my life! My two children both dropped out of school because they would not endure the physical and pscyhological violence being done to them. The school staff would not stop it. One of my brothers dropped out of high school for about the same reason back in the sixties. In his case, a principal pushed him and on top of all the hostility and intimidation he was getting from fellow students after schools were integrated, he decided to drop out. In both cases, three children dropped out of school because government refused to protect them in school. Don't talk to me about the United States government being let down if you drop out of school. It's such hypocrisy! It's none of the government's business, and each time it does get involved in the schools, it only makes the situation worse. Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850

Arguement #15 "I Have A Right to Get An Abortion!"

Arguement: Your liberal friend, Lisa, exclaims, "It's my body! I have the right to get an abortion if I want to. The government has not right to tell me what I can and can not do with my body!"
Answer: Lisa, on this issue you and I agree. I will however use your words against you because what you believe as a liberal except for your stand on abortion is usually contrary to the arguement you are making here. That is why I say that liberals are sick: they are not in contact with reality and contradict themselves consequently.
Yes, it is your body, and government which I define as pompous politicians and their brown-shirt enforcers has no right to tell you what you can do with your body. You are a free person, not the slave of the state. The state has no claim on how you use your body. It cannot force you to carry a baby to delivery. But I demand consistency from you or I'll have to tell you that you are being a hypocrite. You're saying that the government has no right to what your body produces. I agree and add that it applies to more than a baby. You can use your body in many ways to produce many things. A prostitute uses her body to produce money. The whore has a right to the fruits of her labor: money or whatever she is given in exchage for the service of her body. The rocket scientist has a perfect right to the fruits of the labor of his body which comes mainly from using his head. The state has no right to make you grow a baby, and if you do deliver a baby, the state has no right to that baby. Likewise the state has no right to other things that you use your body to produce.
I consider it a necessary evil that we have to pay taxes for such things as police, firemen, and national defense. Such things are necessary for each individual's self-protection which is the only legitimate function of goverment. A proper government acts only as an agent of man's self-protection. A proper government does not force you to use a part of your life to pay for a part of another man or woman's life. A proper government does not take your money and distribute it to others. That is slavery, and supposedly that was outlawed in America. It is one of life's ironies that American blacks with slave blood in them and so righteous about the evilness of slavery done to their ancestors are for the most part Liberal Democrats who want to force financially productive people to give up a portion of their money to those who are financially less productive, mainly, in race ratios, blacks and Hispanics. That is slavery.
I abhor abortions. An abortion kills an innocent baby. There is a simple, honorable answer to not wanting to raise a child: adoption. I will agree that there needs to be more incentives to adoption because for too many children are being killed in abortions. Governement has created a lack of incentives by outlawing payments by adoptive parents for a child. If a mother were able to sell her child to adoptive parents approved by social services and reviewed by the court, I am certain that there would be far fewer babies being aborted. What is less bad - selling a baby or killing a baby? This is not a perfect world and selling your baby through an adoption process would be far better than killing her through an abortion. Do I make myself clear? Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850.

Arguement #14 "It's Wrong To Torture"

I have no arguement with this, and I am not going to try to weasel out with any
"Yes, buts." Having seen the dark side of law enforcemnet and judicial proceedings, I am loath to see torture accepted for terrorists becauase I know that "terrorists" will soon degenerate into a catch-phrase for anyone the people currently in power don't like. Just this morning, talk-show host, Neal Boortz, read snippets from "My Barack Obama.com" which included "people who are against health-care reform are right-wing domestic terrorists and are the heirs of bin Ladin." Torture is wrong and besides that, cannot be accepted out of purely self-interests - You could easily be called a terrorist if you don't go along with the party in power especially as the party begins to lose power due to its increasingly exposed corruption and its desire to force Americans into economic and psychological misery. We must not become like our enemies in order to defeat them. Bill Gertz in his book "Betrayed" concludes that the CIA is a statist agency primarily concerned about itself and unable to protect America and suggests structures to replace it. What we need is an agency perhaps like Blackwater that can establish an intelligence system of spies and informants in foreign countries. Pablo Escobar has shown us how well such a system works in the drug trade. I do not say that ironically: Escobar's deadly mistake was to go public in his dream to become the president of Columbia and become a politician. This helped expose his drug organization and more importantly, alarmed the power structure in Columbia and probably America. If we don't establish something much more effective than the CIA so that we can have human beings gathering intelligence, we are going to be moved more and more in the direction of snatching humans which is a particular forte of the Navy Seals and then torturing them to find out what they know. This is barbarism that America has to remain above. Let's not forget that in spite of Obama's lofty, flowery speeches against torture, he, like a true egomaniac, has retained the power of rendering for himself and himself alone. Rendering is nothing but cowardly torture by proxy. We, meaning America, must not become the enemy to beat the enemy. Why did we bother then? Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0950. PS. Possibly my columns are eliciting some attention: I am getting calls from a certain number, but when I call the number, there is no ring. Jingle, jingle.

Arguement #13 "We Have A Moral Imperative!"

The Liberal Arguement: Lisa, the liberal, tells you," Did you hear what Obama just said? We have a moral imperative to vote for health care for others? We are our brothers' and sisters' keepers."
Your arguement: "Lisa, first Obama is being a hypocrite big time. Don't you remember when he ran for president last year, reporters found he had a half-brother living in a hut in Kenya on a dollar a year. "His brother's keeper" Barack Obama was living large in America having made $5 million on his two books. Was Obama helping his half-brother? No. Then you must remember how reporters next found that he had an aunt living in public housing in Boston. This is the same aunt Obama had written so warmly about in one of his flowery books. Was "his sister's keeper" Obama helping his aunt? No. This man is a shameless liar and hypocrite. Obama is a sick man.
Now let's look at this moral imperative business, Lisa. It is fine for people to believe you should help other people, but it is not fine for them to force people to help other people. This is a free country. Obama didn't believe in helping other people, not even his own family. For a millionaire, I think he's sorry, but that his right. He's a free man. Where does anyone get the right to take money from Obama and make him take care of his family or take care of other families? There is no such right. Not if we are free people. Taking money or other property from people by force is stealing even if it is legal. It is evil no matter how many people have voted to do it. We are having our money taken, stolen, through taxes in order to give to other people. That is stealing, and the people who are having their money taken through taxes to help other people are partial slaves. Barack Obama is a slaver which is ironic since he has black blood though not slave blood in him. But Barack is supported overwhelmingly by blacks with slave blood in them. That makes me wonder if these blacks really think slavery is evil or they are just mad that their ancestors were the slaves and not the slavers or masters." Peter Nickerson at 352-359-0850. PS. AS health care heats up, Floridians are getting hot too. A black man kept yelling at me in Gainesville from his car after he had seen my sign. A white man yelled, "F______ Redneck!" But I am also getting thumbs up from people, including women finally.

Arguement #12 "ObamaCare Will Save Money."

The Arguement: Your liberal friend, Lisa, cries, "I don't know why you people oppose ObamaCare. It will save us money!"
Your Arguement: "Lisa, get real! Do you know a government program that has cost what the legislators said it would? No. There isn't one. The cost has always been much more than what the politicians even dreamed it would be. In 1965 when the government started Medicare, the government assured us - I was alive then - that Part A, Medicare Hospitalization Care, would cost "only" $9 billion by 1990. It didn't: it cost $67 billion, a 744 percent increase above what the politicians said it would cost.
In 1967, the government predicted that the entire Medicaid Program would "only" cost $12 billion by 1990. It actually cost $110 billion by 1990. Not $12 billion as the government predicted, but $110 billion! This was an increase of 917 percent more than what the politicians said it would cost. You can't believe what the politicians tell you about the costs of a program. They are in La-La Land. They'll tell you whatever lies it takes to sell you on what a good deal it will be.
Lisa, the sign of good mental health is the ability to stay in contact with reality. The better your mental health, the more you can stay in contact with reality. The Liberals cannot stay in contact with reality. They lie and deny. That's one reason why I call them sick. You've got to be strong enough to look into their sick lies and find the reality, the facts. Read your local paper, watch Fox News, and if you go to the library, pick up a copy of "The Wall Street Journal" and find the editorials and essays at the end of the first section. Watch and read. Remember and evaluate. History is prelude. History shows that liberals, communists, socialists - collectivists all - sell dreams and deliver nightmares. (Figures come from "We Can't Afford ObamaCare" by Deroy Murdock, Gainesville Sun, page 7A, 8/18/09)
Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850. PS. Today, I heard for the first time Rush Limbaugh bring up that Obama voted once not to provide aid - let them die! - to new-born infants born after unsuccessful attempts to abort them. It was great to hear Rush saying this as people need to know that Obama has already participated in death panels. If Obama is so sick that he will withhold medical care, warmth, and food from newly-born babies until they die, he will surely do that to us Seniors. History is prelude.

Arguement #11 "Socialized Health Care Is Good!"

The Liberal Arguement: Your liberal friend, Lisa, cries, "I don't know what people have against socialized health care! All the other developed countries have it. It's got to be good!"
Your arguement: " Lisa, we don't have socialized health care because we are the leaders in the world in prosperity and freedom. Socialized medicine is bad for your health. In America, cancer kills 50 percent of its victims; in Great Britain breast cancer kills 46 percent of its victims. In America, only 19 percent of the men with prostate cancer die; in Britain, 57 percent do. In 2005, Britain's heart attack fatality rate was 20 percent higher than in America. Steroids provide great relief for back pain. But due to rationing, one health care district in Britain plans to cut the number of steroid shot each year from 60,000 to a mere 3,000 shots. Imagine the suffering that will cause! In Canada, the number of doctors is very low due to rationing and the government cutting the number of medical students. As a result, there are some towns in Canada that hold lotteries to see who will get to have a doctor's appointment made. Then it still takes weeks, even months to see a doctor. Why in America, our pets- our dogs, cats, and horses - and even some injured wild animals get better health care than that. You'd have to be sick to want socialized health care in America, and sick is exactly what Obama and the liberal
Democrats are.
Lisa, you've got to look beyond the Liberal lies you hear and find the truth. I hate saying this, but you are being too ignorant and lazy in the face of such a terrible threat to your health and freedom, that is, socialized health care. Why don't you watch Fox News and read your newspaper? Then maybe you will want to go to some demonstrations with me. Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850.

Arguement #10 "Health Insurers Are Greedy!"

Arguement: Your liberal friend, Lisa, cries, "Those greedy insurance companies!
They make too much money. That's why they won't allow certain procedures, drop you if you get too sick, and don't allow pre-existing conditions. They're just greedy pigs!"
Your Answer: "Lisa, You should be able to see the pattern with Obama. Insurance companies are only the demons of this week. Obama's pattern comes right out of the communist playbook: isolate, demonize, and destroy. Last week it was the pediatricians whom he claimed were taking tonsils out of children not because the children needed it but because there was big money in it for pediatricians. That was an ignorant statement because surgeons not pediatricians take out tonsils. You would think someone with an Ivy League education and two children would know better, especially someone you liberals think is so smart.
Yes Lisa, the liberals' demon of the week is the insurance business. Obama says he wants government-run health care to keep them "honest," and Liberal Democrat and Speaker Of The House Nancy Pelosi said the health insurers were "villanous" and making "immoral profits." I guess Nancy Pelosi has moved on from slandering the CIA. However, as is usual with the lieing Liberals, the facts don't fit their claims. The latest Fortune 500 ranking of the most profitable businesses has the medical insurance business ranked down at No. 35 with a measly profit of only 2.2 percent.
This is from "An Unhealthy Debate" Gainesville (Florida) Sun, page 10A, 8/11/09.
Again, you see how the Liberals lie and demonize. You need to start opposing the Liberal Democrats before they attack you or someone you love. It you don't, it will only be a matter of time before they do. Every week it's someone else in America they're after.
Let me go a step farther, Lisa, beloved Liberal. We are fighting the al-Qaeda in Iraq and are loosing, at the moment, to the Taliban in Afghanistan. But we hear nothing against the members of the al-Qaeda or the members of the Taliban by Obama. Instead, we hear him demonize Americans such as Rush Limbaugh, American doctors, American Health Insurers, and Americans protesting the proposed government takeover of health care. Why is Obama demonizing Americans and not members of the al-Qaeda or the Taliban? It is because Obama is not an American. He grew up outside of America. He has never been mainstream American even when he was living in America. He is not one of us, and he obviously does not like us because he is constantly demonizing us. Obama must be stopped. The pressure on him must be increased until he and his communist blitzkrieg are stopped in their tracks. Let him demonize all he wants, but we have to make sure Americans understand that it is projection not the truth. Ever since I learned he fought as an Illinois senator not to give aid to babies born after it was attempted to abort them, I have known that he is a sick man. Peter Nickerson MS, MSW at 352-359-0850.

Arguement #9 Around 5 Million, Not 46 Million Insured?

Arguement: Your liberal (or Progressive, Socialist - Collectivists all) friend, Lisa, says, "The other day you said something about it wasn't around 44 or so million without health insurance but 8 million. What did you mean by that? How can it be so little with so much concern about the problem? How could you say that President Obama was lieing about the figure? He's so nice and has such a warm smile!"
Your Arguement: "Lisa, Obama does flash a warm smile, and so does every successful con-man. You need to be a little more knowledgeable about the world. I started reading Sally Pipe's book, "The Top Ten Myths Of American Health Care." It was published in October, 2008, and the forward is by Steve Forbes, with an endorsement by Milton Friedman. It's a trustworthy book. Sally Pipe says that the official Obama website in 2007 stated that there were 47 million Americans uninsured currently. But like Obama's beaming smile, that's not all there is to it. It's not that simple. Here are the figures:
47 million uninsured
18 million of them make $50,000 a year and can afford health insurance.
10 million, at least, are not Americans
14 million of them qualify for Medicare, Medicaid, or SCHIP, but haven't got on
the programs.
_______
42 million of the 47 million uninsured then could have insurance or aren't
Americans
5 million Americans are left who may want health insurance but don't make
enough money to afford it. Remember none of these can be turned away
from emergency room so they are getting health care. You are right,
Lisa, what is the big problem? There isn't one. The Democrats are
simply crying wolf because they want to take over health care and
everything else and make us their slaves. The media is 96 percent
Democrat so they are going along too with some exceptions like Fox
News and The Wall Street Journal.

Also Lisa, did you hear that one of the four Democratic health care proposed bills says that all the taxes it mentions cannot be called taxes? Didn't the Democrats go far enough when President Bill Clinton said it depended upon what the word "is" is? Now the Democrats are saing that taxes are not taxes or what is, is not. These are sick people. The only place these sick people will lead us is to chaos and misery. Lisa, you don't need to become a Republican. Be an Independent. Even though I'm a Republican, I qualify it by saying I am an Ayn Rand, Conservative Republican. But get away from the Democrats. They are sick!
Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850.

Arguement #8 Obama Did So Well In New Hampshire

Your liberal friend, Lisa, says, "Did you see Obama yesterday at the town meeting in New Hampshire? He was wonderful! I love him so much!"
Your arguement: " Lisa, Obama was a national disgrace. He stood there and lied to the nation that he had never supported the single payer concept in health care. I was listening to Rush Limbaugh who immediately played a tape of Obama saying he was for single payer, which of course would be the imperial federal government. Lisa, I talked to you yesterday about Obama making dozens of signing statements in which he signed bills into laws but said there were parts of them he would not obey. That is, he blatantly said he was going to break the law! What kind of example is that for Americans, especially blacks who have such a high criminality rate, that is, commit such a high percentage of crimes in America. Obama is just telling blacks to go ahead and break the law because he is going to do it. He not only does it, but he boasts about doing it beforehand!
Yeserday in New Hampshire, when he told that huge lie about never having supported the single payer concept in health care, I wondered what his older daughter thought of that. She is smart as a whip, and I bet she's heard her parents discuss health care and the single payer concept which Obama supports, and I bet she's heard him support it on television and on Youtube. What does she think now that she's heard her father lie that he's never supported it? What does that do to her. It hurts her, just like it hurts blacks and all Americans to hear Obama say he's not going to obey the law. What kind of person is that?
Returning to New Hampshire, Obama did not tell America what the government takeover of health care was; he only defensively told us what it wasn't and in very general terms. He denied there were death panels as Sarah Palin had said, but there is still the provision to have counselors come to talk to seniors aout "dieing with dignity" which is Obama for "dieing early to save us money." Not only that, but this provision of die-early counselors is in the section on how to cut the costs of health care. This is clearly a type of death panel just like our beloved Sarah Palin said. There is another type of death panel planned for us seniors in the health no-care bill: The government will take half a trillion dollars out of Medicare, the health care for us seniors. Just as the huge baby boomer surge is about to become eligible for Medicare. This means less care for seniors and more suffering and early death. Again, Sarah was right on.
Also, Obama lied about there being 47 million Americans without health care. There are about 8 million. Then Obama made a terrible gaffe: He was trying to tell us that the federal government needed to take over health care, and he said something like, 'Look, the post office is in trouble, but Fed Ex and UPS are doing quite well.' That is, a government agency is screwed up, but two free market businesses are doing quite well. Well, that should convince us to want the government to take over health care!
I'm trying to speak adult to adult with you, Lisa. I know about your infatuation with Obama. I loved people too who weren't good. I'm giving you the facts that Obama is no good for you or America. Are you ready to join the truth and freedom lovers?"
Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850
P.S. I have a sign in the back of my SUV that reads, "Stay Free, Stop Obama."
From white males, I get compliments and thumbs up. From females, I get faces, shaking of the head, and even the Bird. Yesterday, a young black woman berated me as she drove, holding her finger up and hollering. Her white passenger looked embarrassed. If you're in the Alachua County- Gainesville City area, and a female, give me some love when you pass me. Women love freedom, good health care, and a good economy too. You won't find those with Obama.

Arguement #7 Obama Is So Friendly

Lisa, the Liberal, asks you, "How can you be against Obama? He's such a nice, friendly man with such a warm smile. He's wonderful! It's horrid to say anything against him!"
You answer: "Lisa, have you ever seen a con-man? Did he have a scowl? Of course not. He had a nice warm smile. If he didn't, he wouldn't be able to con anyone.
President George W. Bush began a criminal activity when he signed bills that had things in it that he didn't like. Instead of legally vetoing the bills, he said he would (illegally) ignore the parts of the bill he didn't like. Since we're talking about George Bush, Lisa, I'm sure you'll agree with what I have just said, and you'll agree that he was setting a horrible example for Americans. He was publicly saying he'd just obey those parts of the law that he agreed with. What if every American followed his example? What if every American, in addition to President Bush, said he'd only obey the parts of laws that he agreed with? There would be anarchy and complete chaos.
Two years ago, along came Barack Obama, an unknown junior Senator, who ran for President of the United States. Out of one side of that nice, warm smile he criticized President Bush for those signing statements I have just told you about. But out of the other side of that nice, warm smile, he said he himself would do it as little as possible. Apparently, Obama doesn't have a lot of self-discipline since having been elected President he has issued dozens of signing statements saying he will ignore parts of laws he didn't like. What kind of example is that to our citizens, to our children, is our President being? A very bad one, unfortunately. He is blatantly broadcastting that he will be a criminal, a law-breaker. Now, Lisa, do you sort of see why parents and grandparents are so upset with Obama and the Democrats? Besides, when a President publicly says he's not going to obey the law - therefore being a criminal - one has to wonder what horrible criminal acts he is doing that he is keeping secret. Obama and the Democrats are much worse than George Bush, and you shouldn't associate with them, Lisa!
Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-259=0850. If this "seems fishy" please report me to Obama's director of communication for health care reform at flag@whitehouse.gov. He can start positioning his laser satellite immediately. I'm the one wearing a camouflage shirt, red gym shorts, and gray Ecco running shoes.
See "Obama Adopts A Tactic He Has Criticized" from the liberal "Gainesville Sun" (Florida) page 7a,8/9/09.

Arguement #6 Liberals Are Morally Superior

Your liberal friend, Lisa, sniffs, "We Liberals care about the poor and the downtrodden. That's why we vote for programs that help people. You Republicans don't care. You have the philosophy of cavemen! It's just horrible the way you people behave!"
Your answer: "You couldn't be more wrong. Study after study has shown that Republicans give more money and time to charities than Democrats do. When you vote for social programs, you are voting to spend by force other people's money. Taking other people's money by force is stealing, and it is immoral. You claim government has no right to force a woman to have a baby because it is her body. You say government has no right to her body which I agree with. But then you turn around and say it is all right for government to force people to give up their money through taxation for social programs. Those people paying forced taxes have used their bodies, their lives, to accumulate that money. The government has no business taking their money just as the government has no business forcing a woman to carry a baby or whatever you demented people call him. So why the double standard? It's hypocrisy.
I've just shown you that you Liberals are stingy with your own money and time when it comes to the poor and are immoral and hypocritical in using force to take money away from one group to give it to another group. Why do you like being a Liberal, Lisa? I think you should consider that carefully.
If you do look carefully, you will see that everything a Liberal espouses is only cover for the fact that he wants the power to force you into unimagineable misery. Just look at Obama and his health "care." It's going to be the death sentence for us seniors! This is why Democrats are being caught in one lie after another. Just look at Pelosi and her lies that the CIA lied to her and the lie that loud, even disruptive health care dissent is "un-American."
Do you think she even knows that this country was founded by a loud, disruptive revolution against England? Being loud and disruptive is what Americans are. We are not tippy-toers! Did Pelosi rail against the Code Pinkers when they interrupted President Bush? No. More hypocrisy! The Liberal is addicted to the high he gets from forcing you into misery. Forcing you into misery is his drug. Liberal Lisa, you shouldn't want to be a part of that. Change, Baby, change!" Peter Nickerson at 352-359-0850.

Arguement #5 The Rich Just Keep Getting Richer, And The Poorer

The arguement: The Liberal (or Communist, Marxist, Democrat, Fascist - collectivists all) pontificates to you: " We have to have federal intervention (force) into wages. Why, the rich are just getting richer, and the poor poorer! It's not fair!
Your Answer: "The amount of money you earn is usually always changing for the better. You earn barely enough to get by on when you are young and much more when you are older. In Thomas Sowell's book, 'Basic Economy,' he states that 'fewer than 3 percent in the bottom 20 percent of wage-earners in 1975 were still there in 1991. That means that in 16 years 97 percent of the wage-earners in the bottom 20 percent of wage-earners were no longer there, but had moved up. That is wonderful! But it even gets better:39 percent of the bottom 20 percent were in the top 20 percent of wage-earners by 1991. Just 16 years later! That is fantastic! The poor are definitely getting richer. Don't try to spread your misery on me. You really need to take a Paxil or Prozac, Liberal.
See "Basic Economics" by Thomas Sowell, page 137. Peter Nickerson at 352-359-0850.

Arguement #4 Socialized Medicine

The Liberal blithely says, " Socialized medicine is so wonderful! Why the British love theirs!"
How To Argue And Win: "If the British love their government medicine, they must be brain-dead! Recently, I read in the "Gainesville Sun" which as a member of the "New York Times" newspaper family is hardly concerned with the plight of the individual human being - that's you and I, by the way- that in England the emergency rooms cannot handle the cases coming in by ambulance. There is a law saying that anyone who comes into the emergency room must be seen within a certain amount of time. In order not to break that law, the hospital administrators are asking the ambulance drivers not to bring their patients in, but to park their ambulances around the hospital grounds and wait until the patient can be seen. Now there are so many ambulances parked around the hospitals that there are no ambulances available for other emergencies. Surely not even a Liberal could love that situation. Peter Nickerson at 352-359-0850.

Arguement #3 FDR's New Deal

The Liberal says, "President Obama is wisely using federal intervention to jump-start the economy just like FDR did during the Great Depression with the New Deal. We are so fortunate to have such a magnificent man at the helm now!"
How To Argue And Win: "Actually FDR did not initiate federal intervention into the economy, but his predecessor, President Hoover, did, beginning in 1929. FDR simply took over and expanded Hoover's policies. It was not until the United States entered World War II in 1941 that employment dropped. What happened? First, FDR said during one of his Fireside Chats over the radio that he had stopped being "Dr. New Deal" and had become "Dr. Win-The-War." He ceased his hostility toward business (Obama needs to pay attention) and became business-friendly. He offered business contracts to business that businesses could make handsome profits from, and he reduced the rate of deficit spending. He put 12 million people into full-time employment as soldiers in the Armed Forces. In short, he stopped putting so much money into dead-end government jobs and put money into the private sector, the one that produces goods and services. Then he became business-friendly." See Thomas Sowell's "The Housing Boom and Bust," especially pages 130-145 and 148.

Arguements #1 and #2 Competition And Gouging

Arguement One: The Liberal (Communist, Democrat, Socialist - collectivists all) sniffs, "We don't like competition, and don't allow our children to play games and sports where there are scores and winners and losers. We value peace and cooperation, and plan to teach our children the same. We're above competition. That's so old school!"
Answer: "Scarcity is a fact of life, and therefore you have no choice but to comptete in the adult world. It was only in the Garden Of Eden that man had everything and all he wanted. Now man must compete as resources are finite and can be used for many alternative uses. If you want to prepare your children for the real world of adult competition, you will have them enter into competitive activities.
See Thomas Sowell's "Basic Economics."
Arguement Two: The Liberal says, "I am so glad that our state has enacted anti-gouging laws during hurricanes so greedy hotel-owners and store-owners cant raise their prices during hurricanes. That's gouging, and it's despicable!"
Answer: This is not the blessing you think it is. As a nation of free people, you have the absolute of liberty. A free person has the right to his body. If he uses his body to own a motel that he wants to rent for $300 a night, that's his business. If he uses his body to offer $50 flashlights during hurricanes, that's his right. The liberal woman said it all when she said government had no right to her body, and if she wanted an abortion, she could have one as it was her body. Now it's time for you liberals to be consistent and not hypocrites. If it works for the woman wanting an abortion, it works for the man wanting $300 for a motel room during a hurricane.
In terms of economic cause and effects, if the motel owner can't raise his prices during hurricanes, the first people to arrive there may rent several rooms. One for the children, and one for the parents. But if the motel owner doubles or triples the price of a room, the families getting there first are not going to get a couple of rooms. They'll settle with one. This leaves a room available to other families taking refuge from the storm and brings about sharing that no one is even aware they are doing. See Thomas Sowell's "Basic Economics."