The Liberal Arguement: Lisa, the liberal, tells you," Did you hear what Obama just said? We have a moral imperative to vote for health care for others? We are our brothers' and sisters' keepers."
Your arguement: "Lisa, first Obama is being a hypocrite big time. Don't you remember when he ran for president last year, reporters found he had a half-brother living in a hut in Kenya on a dollar a year. "His brother's keeper" Barack Obama was living large in America having made $5 million on his two books. Was Obama helping his half-brother? No. Then you must remember how reporters next found that he had an aunt living in public housing in Boston. This is the same aunt Obama had written so warmly about in one of his flowery books. Was "his sister's keeper" Obama helping his aunt? No. This man is a shameless liar and hypocrite. Obama is a sick man.
Now let's look at this moral imperative business, Lisa. It is fine for people to believe you should help other people, but it is not fine for them to force people to help other people. This is a free country. Obama didn't believe in helping other people, not even his own family. For a millionaire, I think he's sorry, but that his right. He's a free man. Where does anyone get the right to take money from Obama and make him take care of his family or take care of other families? There is no such right. Not if we are free people. Taking money or other property from people by force is stealing even if it is legal. It is evil no matter how many people have voted to do it. We are having our money taken, stolen, through taxes in order to give to other people. That is stealing, and the people who are having their money taken through taxes to help other people are partial slaves. Barack Obama is a slaver which is ironic since he has black blood though not slave blood in him. But Barack is supported overwhelmingly by blacks with slave blood in them. That makes me wonder if these blacks really think slavery is evil or they are just mad that their ancestors were the slaves and not the slavers or masters." Peter Nickerson at 352-359-0850. PS. AS health care heats up, Floridians are getting hot too. A black man kept yelling at me in Gainesville from his car after he had seen my sign. A white man yelled, "F______ Redneck!" But I am also getting thumbs up from people, including women finally.
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Wednesday, August 19, 2009
Arguement #12 "ObamaCare Will Save Money."
The Arguement: Your liberal friend, Lisa, cries, "I don't know why you people oppose ObamaCare. It will save us money!"
Your Arguement: "Lisa, get real! Do you know a government program that has cost what the legislators said it would? No. There isn't one. The cost has always been much more than what the politicians even dreamed it would be. In 1965 when the government started Medicare, the government assured us - I was alive then - that Part A, Medicare Hospitalization Care, would cost "only" $9 billion by 1990. It didn't: it cost $67 billion, a 744 percent increase above what the politicians said it would cost.
In 1967, the government predicted that the entire Medicaid Program would "only" cost $12 billion by 1990. It actually cost $110 billion by 1990. Not $12 billion as the government predicted, but $110 billion! This was an increase of 917 percent more than what the politicians said it would cost. You can't believe what the politicians tell you about the costs of a program. They are in La-La Land. They'll tell you whatever lies it takes to sell you on what a good deal it will be.
Lisa, the sign of good mental health is the ability to stay in contact with reality. The better your mental health, the more you can stay in contact with reality. The Liberals cannot stay in contact with reality. They lie and deny. That's one reason why I call them sick. You've got to be strong enough to look into their sick lies and find the reality, the facts. Read your local paper, watch Fox News, and if you go to the library, pick up a copy of "The Wall Street Journal" and find the editorials and essays at the end of the first section. Watch and read. Remember and evaluate. History is prelude. History shows that liberals, communists, socialists - collectivists all - sell dreams and deliver nightmares. (Figures come from "We Can't Afford ObamaCare" by Deroy Murdock, Gainesville Sun, page 7A, 8/18/09)
Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850. PS. Today, I heard for the first time Rush Limbaugh bring up that Obama voted once not to provide aid - let them die! - to new-born infants born after unsuccessful attempts to abort them. It was great to hear Rush saying this as people need to know that Obama has already participated in death panels. If Obama is so sick that he will withhold medical care, warmth, and food from newly-born babies until they die, he will surely do that to us Seniors. History is prelude.
Your Arguement: "Lisa, get real! Do you know a government program that has cost what the legislators said it would? No. There isn't one. The cost has always been much more than what the politicians even dreamed it would be. In 1965 when the government started Medicare, the government assured us - I was alive then - that Part A, Medicare Hospitalization Care, would cost "only" $9 billion by 1990. It didn't: it cost $67 billion, a 744 percent increase above what the politicians said it would cost.
In 1967, the government predicted that the entire Medicaid Program would "only" cost $12 billion by 1990. It actually cost $110 billion by 1990. Not $12 billion as the government predicted, but $110 billion! This was an increase of 917 percent more than what the politicians said it would cost. You can't believe what the politicians tell you about the costs of a program. They are in La-La Land. They'll tell you whatever lies it takes to sell you on what a good deal it will be.
Lisa, the sign of good mental health is the ability to stay in contact with reality. The better your mental health, the more you can stay in contact with reality. The Liberals cannot stay in contact with reality. They lie and deny. That's one reason why I call them sick. You've got to be strong enough to look into their sick lies and find the reality, the facts. Read your local paper, watch Fox News, and if you go to the library, pick up a copy of "The Wall Street Journal" and find the editorials and essays at the end of the first section. Watch and read. Remember and evaluate. History is prelude. History shows that liberals, communists, socialists - collectivists all - sell dreams and deliver nightmares. (Figures come from "We Can't Afford ObamaCare" by Deroy Murdock, Gainesville Sun, page 7A, 8/18/09)
Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850. PS. Today, I heard for the first time Rush Limbaugh bring up that Obama voted once not to provide aid - let them die! - to new-born infants born after unsuccessful attempts to abort them. It was great to hear Rush saying this as people need to know that Obama has already participated in death panels. If Obama is so sick that he will withhold medical care, warmth, and food from newly-born babies until they die, he will surely do that to us Seniors. History is prelude.
Tuesday, August 18, 2009
Arguement #11 "Socialized Health Care Is Good!"
The Liberal Arguement: Your liberal friend, Lisa, cries, "I don't know what people have against socialized health care! All the other developed countries have it. It's got to be good!"
Your arguement: " Lisa, we don't have socialized health care because we are the leaders in the world in prosperity and freedom. Socialized medicine is bad for your health. In America, cancer kills 50 percent of its victims; in Great Britain breast cancer kills 46 percent of its victims. In America, only 19 percent of the men with prostate cancer die; in Britain, 57 percent do. In 2005, Britain's heart attack fatality rate was 20 percent higher than in America. Steroids provide great relief for back pain. But due to rationing, one health care district in Britain plans to cut the number of steroid shot each year from 60,000 to a mere 3,000 shots. Imagine the suffering that will cause! In Canada, the number of doctors is very low due to rationing and the government cutting the number of medical students. As a result, there are some towns in Canada that hold lotteries to see who will get to have a doctor's appointment made. Then it still takes weeks, even months to see a doctor. Why in America, our pets- our dogs, cats, and horses - and even some injured wild animals get better health care than that. You'd have to be sick to want socialized health care in America, and sick is exactly what Obama and the liberal
Democrats are.
Lisa, you've got to look beyond the Liberal lies you hear and find the truth. I hate saying this, but you are being too ignorant and lazy in the face of such a terrible threat to your health and freedom, that is, socialized health care. Why don't you watch Fox News and read your newspaper? Then maybe you will want to go to some demonstrations with me. Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850.
Your arguement: " Lisa, we don't have socialized health care because we are the leaders in the world in prosperity and freedom. Socialized medicine is bad for your health. In America, cancer kills 50 percent of its victims; in Great Britain breast cancer kills 46 percent of its victims. In America, only 19 percent of the men with prostate cancer die; in Britain, 57 percent do. In 2005, Britain's heart attack fatality rate was 20 percent higher than in America. Steroids provide great relief for back pain. But due to rationing, one health care district in Britain plans to cut the number of steroid shot each year from 60,000 to a mere 3,000 shots. Imagine the suffering that will cause! In Canada, the number of doctors is very low due to rationing and the government cutting the number of medical students. As a result, there are some towns in Canada that hold lotteries to see who will get to have a doctor's appointment made. Then it still takes weeks, even months to see a doctor. Why in America, our pets- our dogs, cats, and horses - and even some injured wild animals get better health care than that. You'd have to be sick to want socialized health care in America, and sick is exactly what Obama and the liberal
Democrats are.
Lisa, you've got to look beyond the Liberal lies you hear and find the truth. I hate saying this, but you are being too ignorant and lazy in the face of such a terrible threat to your health and freedom, that is, socialized health care. Why don't you watch Fox News and read your newspaper? Then maybe you will want to go to some demonstrations with me. Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850.
Monday, August 17, 2009
Arguement #10 "Health Insurers Are Greedy!"
Arguement: Your liberal friend, Lisa, cries, "Those greedy insurance companies!
They make too much money. That's why they won't allow certain procedures, drop you if you get too sick, and don't allow pre-existing conditions. They're just greedy pigs!"
Your Answer: "Lisa, You should be able to see the pattern with Obama. Insurance companies are only the demons of this week. Obama's pattern comes right out of the communist playbook: isolate, demonize, and destroy. Last week it was the pediatricians whom he claimed were taking tonsils out of children not because the children needed it but because there was big money in it for pediatricians. That was an ignorant statement because surgeons not pediatricians take out tonsils. You would think someone with an Ivy League education and two children would know better, especially someone you liberals think is so smart.
Yes Lisa, the liberals' demon of the week is the insurance business. Obama says he wants government-run health care to keep them "honest," and Liberal Democrat and Speaker Of The House Nancy Pelosi said the health insurers were "villanous" and making "immoral profits." I guess Nancy Pelosi has moved on from slandering the CIA. However, as is usual with the lieing Liberals, the facts don't fit their claims. The latest Fortune 500 ranking of the most profitable businesses has the medical insurance business ranked down at No. 35 with a measly profit of only 2.2 percent.
This is from "An Unhealthy Debate" Gainesville (Florida) Sun, page 10A, 8/11/09.
Again, you see how the Liberals lie and demonize. You need to start opposing the Liberal Democrats before they attack you or someone you love. It you don't, it will only be a matter of time before they do. Every week it's someone else in America they're after.
Let me go a step farther, Lisa, beloved Liberal. We are fighting the al-Qaeda in Iraq and are loosing, at the moment, to the Taliban in Afghanistan. But we hear nothing against the members of the al-Qaeda or the members of the Taliban by Obama. Instead, we hear him demonize Americans such as Rush Limbaugh, American doctors, American Health Insurers, and Americans protesting the proposed government takeover of health care. Why is Obama demonizing Americans and not members of the al-Qaeda or the Taliban? It is because Obama is not an American. He grew up outside of America. He has never been mainstream American even when he was living in America. He is not one of us, and he obviously does not like us because he is constantly demonizing us. Obama must be stopped. The pressure on him must be increased until he and his communist blitzkrieg are stopped in their tracks. Let him demonize all he wants, but we have to make sure Americans understand that it is projection not the truth. Ever since I learned he fought as an Illinois senator not to give aid to babies born after it was attempted to abort them, I have known that he is a sick man. Peter Nickerson MS, MSW at 352-359-0850.
They make too much money. That's why they won't allow certain procedures, drop you if you get too sick, and don't allow pre-existing conditions. They're just greedy pigs!"
Your Answer: "Lisa, You should be able to see the pattern with Obama. Insurance companies are only the demons of this week. Obama's pattern comes right out of the communist playbook: isolate, demonize, and destroy. Last week it was the pediatricians whom he claimed were taking tonsils out of children not because the children needed it but because there was big money in it for pediatricians. That was an ignorant statement because surgeons not pediatricians take out tonsils. You would think someone with an Ivy League education and two children would know better, especially someone you liberals think is so smart.
Yes Lisa, the liberals' demon of the week is the insurance business. Obama says he wants government-run health care to keep them "honest," and Liberal Democrat and Speaker Of The House Nancy Pelosi said the health insurers were "villanous" and making "immoral profits." I guess Nancy Pelosi has moved on from slandering the CIA. However, as is usual with the lieing Liberals, the facts don't fit their claims. The latest Fortune 500 ranking of the most profitable businesses has the medical insurance business ranked down at No. 35 with a measly profit of only 2.2 percent.
This is from "An Unhealthy Debate" Gainesville (Florida) Sun, page 10A, 8/11/09.
Again, you see how the Liberals lie and demonize. You need to start opposing the Liberal Democrats before they attack you or someone you love. It you don't, it will only be a matter of time before they do. Every week it's someone else in America they're after.
Let me go a step farther, Lisa, beloved Liberal. We are fighting the al-Qaeda in Iraq and are loosing, at the moment, to the Taliban in Afghanistan. But we hear nothing against the members of the al-Qaeda or the members of the Taliban by Obama. Instead, we hear him demonize Americans such as Rush Limbaugh, American doctors, American Health Insurers, and Americans protesting the proposed government takeover of health care. Why is Obama demonizing Americans and not members of the al-Qaeda or the Taliban? It is because Obama is not an American. He grew up outside of America. He has never been mainstream American even when he was living in America. He is not one of us, and he obviously does not like us because he is constantly demonizing us. Obama must be stopped. The pressure on him must be increased until he and his communist blitzkrieg are stopped in their tracks. Let him demonize all he wants, but we have to make sure Americans understand that it is projection not the truth. Ever since I learned he fought as an Illinois senator not to give aid to babies born after it was attempted to abort them, I have known that he is a sick man. Peter Nickerson MS, MSW at 352-359-0850.
Friday, August 14, 2009
Arguement #9 Around 5 Million, Not 46 Million Insured?
Arguement: Your liberal (or Progressive, Socialist - Collectivists all) friend, Lisa, says, "The other day you said something about it wasn't around 44 or so million without health insurance but 8 million. What did you mean by that? How can it be so little with so much concern about the problem? How could you say that President Obama was lieing about the figure? He's so nice and has such a warm smile!"
Your Arguement: "Lisa, Obama does flash a warm smile, and so does every successful con-man. You need to be a little more knowledgeable about the world. I started reading Sally Pipe's book, "The Top Ten Myths Of American Health Care." It was published in October, 2008, and the forward is by Steve Forbes, with an endorsement by Milton Friedman. It's a trustworthy book. Sally Pipe says that the official Obama website in 2007 stated that there were 47 million Americans uninsured currently. But like Obama's beaming smile, that's not all there is to it. It's not that simple. Here are the figures:
47 million uninsured
18 million of them make $50,000 a year and can afford health insurance.
10 million, at least, are not Americans
14 million of them qualify for Medicare, Medicaid, or SCHIP, but haven't got on
the programs.
_______
42 million of the 47 million uninsured then could have insurance or aren't
Americans
5 million Americans are left who may want health insurance but don't make
enough money to afford it. Remember none of these can be turned away
from emergency room so they are getting health care. You are right,
Lisa, what is the big problem? There isn't one. The Democrats are
simply crying wolf because they want to take over health care and
everything else and make us their slaves. The media is 96 percent
Democrat so they are going along too with some exceptions like Fox
News and The Wall Street Journal.
Also Lisa, did you hear that one of the four Democratic health care proposed bills says that all the taxes it mentions cannot be called taxes? Didn't the Democrats go far enough when President Bill Clinton said it depended upon what the word "is" is? Now the Democrats are saing that taxes are not taxes or what is, is not. These are sick people. The only place these sick people will lead us is to chaos and misery. Lisa, you don't need to become a Republican. Be an Independent. Even though I'm a Republican, I qualify it by saying I am an Ayn Rand, Conservative Republican. But get away from the Democrats. They are sick!
Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850.
Your Arguement: "Lisa, Obama does flash a warm smile, and so does every successful con-man. You need to be a little more knowledgeable about the world. I started reading Sally Pipe's book, "The Top Ten Myths Of American Health Care." It was published in October, 2008, and the forward is by Steve Forbes, with an endorsement by Milton Friedman. It's a trustworthy book. Sally Pipe says that the official Obama website in 2007 stated that there were 47 million Americans uninsured currently. But like Obama's beaming smile, that's not all there is to it. It's not that simple. Here are the figures:
47 million uninsured
18 million of them make $50,000 a year and can afford health insurance.
10 million, at least, are not Americans
14 million of them qualify for Medicare, Medicaid, or SCHIP, but haven't got on
the programs.
_______
42 million of the 47 million uninsured then could have insurance or aren't
Americans
5 million Americans are left who may want health insurance but don't make
enough money to afford it. Remember none of these can be turned away
from emergency room so they are getting health care. You are right,
Lisa, what is the big problem? There isn't one. The Democrats are
simply crying wolf because they want to take over health care and
everything else and make us their slaves. The media is 96 percent
Democrat so they are going along too with some exceptions like Fox
News and The Wall Street Journal.
Also Lisa, did you hear that one of the four Democratic health care proposed bills says that all the taxes it mentions cannot be called taxes? Didn't the Democrats go far enough when President Bill Clinton said it depended upon what the word "is" is? Now the Democrats are saing that taxes are not taxes or what is, is not. These are sick people. The only place these sick people will lead us is to chaos and misery. Lisa, you don't need to become a Republican. Be an Independent. Even though I'm a Republican, I qualify it by saying I am an Ayn Rand, Conservative Republican. But get away from the Democrats. They are sick!
Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850.
Wednesday, August 12, 2009
Arguement #8 Obama Did So Well In New Hampshire
Your liberal friend, Lisa, says, "Did you see Obama yesterday at the town meeting in New Hampshire? He was wonderful! I love him so much!"
Your arguement: " Lisa, Obama was a national disgrace. He stood there and lied to the nation that he had never supported the single payer concept in health care. I was listening to Rush Limbaugh who immediately played a tape of Obama saying he was for single payer, which of course would be the imperial federal government. Lisa, I talked to you yesterday about Obama making dozens of signing statements in which he signed bills into laws but said there were parts of them he would not obey. That is, he blatantly said he was going to break the law! What kind of example is that for Americans, especially blacks who have such a high criminality rate, that is, commit such a high percentage of crimes in America. Obama is just telling blacks to go ahead and break the law because he is going to do it. He not only does it, but he boasts about doing it beforehand!
Yeserday in New Hampshire, when he told that huge lie about never having supported the single payer concept in health care, I wondered what his older daughter thought of that. She is smart as a whip, and I bet she's heard her parents discuss health care and the single payer concept which Obama supports, and I bet she's heard him support it on television and on Youtube. What does she think now that she's heard her father lie that he's never supported it? What does that do to her. It hurts her, just like it hurts blacks and all Americans to hear Obama say he's not going to obey the law. What kind of person is that?
Returning to New Hampshire, Obama did not tell America what the government takeover of health care was; he only defensively told us what it wasn't and in very general terms. He denied there were death panels as Sarah Palin had said, but there is still the provision to have counselors come to talk to seniors aout "dieing with dignity" which is Obama for "dieing early to save us money." Not only that, but this provision of die-early counselors is in the section on how to cut the costs of health care. This is clearly a type of death panel just like our beloved Sarah Palin said. There is another type of death panel planned for us seniors in the health no-care bill: The government will take half a trillion dollars out of Medicare, the health care for us seniors. Just as the huge baby boomer surge is about to become eligible for Medicare. This means less care for seniors and more suffering and early death. Again, Sarah was right on.
Also, Obama lied about there being 47 million Americans without health care. There are about 8 million. Then Obama made a terrible gaffe: He was trying to tell us that the federal government needed to take over health care, and he said something like, 'Look, the post office is in trouble, but Fed Ex and UPS are doing quite well.' That is, a government agency is screwed up, but two free market businesses are doing quite well. Well, that should convince us to want the government to take over health care!
I'm trying to speak adult to adult with you, Lisa. I know about your infatuation with Obama. I loved people too who weren't good. I'm giving you the facts that Obama is no good for you or America. Are you ready to join the truth and freedom lovers?"
Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850
P.S. I have a sign in the back of my SUV that reads, "Stay Free, Stop Obama."
From white males, I get compliments and thumbs up. From females, I get faces, shaking of the head, and even the Bird. Yesterday, a young black woman berated me as she drove, holding her finger up and hollering. Her white passenger looked embarrassed. If you're in the Alachua County- Gainesville City area, and a female, give me some love when you pass me. Women love freedom, good health care, and a good economy too. You won't find those with Obama.
Your arguement: " Lisa, Obama was a national disgrace. He stood there and lied to the nation that he had never supported the single payer concept in health care. I was listening to Rush Limbaugh who immediately played a tape of Obama saying he was for single payer, which of course would be the imperial federal government. Lisa, I talked to you yesterday about Obama making dozens of signing statements in which he signed bills into laws but said there were parts of them he would not obey. That is, he blatantly said he was going to break the law! What kind of example is that for Americans, especially blacks who have such a high criminality rate, that is, commit such a high percentage of crimes in America. Obama is just telling blacks to go ahead and break the law because he is going to do it. He not only does it, but he boasts about doing it beforehand!
Yeserday in New Hampshire, when he told that huge lie about never having supported the single payer concept in health care, I wondered what his older daughter thought of that. She is smart as a whip, and I bet she's heard her parents discuss health care and the single payer concept which Obama supports, and I bet she's heard him support it on television and on Youtube. What does she think now that she's heard her father lie that he's never supported it? What does that do to her. It hurts her, just like it hurts blacks and all Americans to hear Obama say he's not going to obey the law. What kind of person is that?
Returning to New Hampshire, Obama did not tell America what the government takeover of health care was; he only defensively told us what it wasn't and in very general terms. He denied there were death panels as Sarah Palin had said, but there is still the provision to have counselors come to talk to seniors aout "dieing with dignity" which is Obama for "dieing early to save us money." Not only that, but this provision of die-early counselors is in the section on how to cut the costs of health care. This is clearly a type of death panel just like our beloved Sarah Palin said. There is another type of death panel planned for us seniors in the health no-care bill: The government will take half a trillion dollars out of Medicare, the health care for us seniors. Just as the huge baby boomer surge is about to become eligible for Medicare. This means less care for seniors and more suffering and early death. Again, Sarah was right on.
Also, Obama lied about there being 47 million Americans without health care. There are about 8 million. Then Obama made a terrible gaffe: He was trying to tell us that the federal government needed to take over health care, and he said something like, 'Look, the post office is in trouble, but Fed Ex and UPS are doing quite well.' That is, a government agency is screwed up, but two free market businesses are doing quite well. Well, that should convince us to want the government to take over health care!
I'm trying to speak adult to adult with you, Lisa. I know about your infatuation with Obama. I loved people too who weren't good. I'm giving you the facts that Obama is no good for you or America. Are you ready to join the truth and freedom lovers?"
Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850
P.S. I have a sign in the back of my SUV that reads, "Stay Free, Stop Obama."
From white males, I get compliments and thumbs up. From females, I get faces, shaking of the head, and even the Bird. Yesterday, a young black woman berated me as she drove, holding her finger up and hollering. Her white passenger looked embarrassed. If you're in the Alachua County- Gainesville City area, and a female, give me some love when you pass me. Women love freedom, good health care, and a good economy too. You won't find those with Obama.
Tuesday, August 11, 2009
Arguement #7 Obama Is So Friendly
Lisa, the Liberal, asks you, "How can you be against Obama? He's such a nice, friendly man with such a warm smile. He's wonderful! It's horrid to say anything against him!"
You answer: "Lisa, have you ever seen a con-man? Did he have a scowl? Of course not. He had a nice warm smile. If he didn't, he wouldn't be able to con anyone.
President George W. Bush began a criminal activity when he signed bills that had things in it that he didn't like. Instead of legally vetoing the bills, he said he would (illegally) ignore the parts of the bill he didn't like. Since we're talking about George Bush, Lisa, I'm sure you'll agree with what I have just said, and you'll agree that he was setting a horrible example for Americans. He was publicly saying he'd just obey those parts of the law that he agreed with. What if every American followed his example? What if every American, in addition to President Bush, said he'd only obey the parts of laws that he agreed with? There would be anarchy and complete chaos.
Two years ago, along came Barack Obama, an unknown junior Senator, who ran for President of the United States. Out of one side of that nice, warm smile he criticized President Bush for those signing statements I have just told you about. But out of the other side of that nice, warm smile, he said he himself would do it as little as possible. Apparently, Obama doesn't have a lot of self-discipline since having been elected President he has issued dozens of signing statements saying he will ignore parts of laws he didn't like. What kind of example is that to our citizens, to our children, is our President being? A very bad one, unfortunately. He is blatantly broadcastting that he will be a criminal, a law-breaker. Now, Lisa, do you sort of see why parents and grandparents are so upset with Obama and the Democrats? Besides, when a President publicly says he's not going to obey the law - therefore being a criminal - one has to wonder what horrible criminal acts he is doing that he is keeping secret. Obama and the Democrats are much worse than George Bush, and you shouldn't associate with them, Lisa!
Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-259=0850. If this "seems fishy" please report me to Obama's director of communication for health care reform at flag@whitehouse.gov. He can start positioning his laser satellite immediately. I'm the one wearing a camouflage shirt, red gym shorts, and gray Ecco running shoes.
See "Obama Adopts A Tactic He Has Criticized" from the liberal "Gainesville Sun" (Florida) page 7a,8/9/09.
You answer: "Lisa, have you ever seen a con-man? Did he have a scowl? Of course not. He had a nice warm smile. If he didn't, he wouldn't be able to con anyone.
President George W. Bush began a criminal activity when he signed bills that had things in it that he didn't like. Instead of legally vetoing the bills, he said he would (illegally) ignore the parts of the bill he didn't like. Since we're talking about George Bush, Lisa, I'm sure you'll agree with what I have just said, and you'll agree that he was setting a horrible example for Americans. He was publicly saying he'd just obey those parts of the law that he agreed with. What if every American followed his example? What if every American, in addition to President Bush, said he'd only obey the parts of laws that he agreed with? There would be anarchy and complete chaos.
Two years ago, along came Barack Obama, an unknown junior Senator, who ran for President of the United States. Out of one side of that nice, warm smile he criticized President Bush for those signing statements I have just told you about. But out of the other side of that nice, warm smile, he said he himself would do it as little as possible. Apparently, Obama doesn't have a lot of self-discipline since having been elected President he has issued dozens of signing statements saying he will ignore parts of laws he didn't like. What kind of example is that to our citizens, to our children, is our President being? A very bad one, unfortunately. He is blatantly broadcastting that he will be a criminal, a law-breaker. Now, Lisa, do you sort of see why parents and grandparents are so upset with Obama and the Democrats? Besides, when a President publicly says he's not going to obey the law - therefore being a criminal - one has to wonder what horrible criminal acts he is doing that he is keeping secret. Obama and the Democrats are much worse than George Bush, and you shouldn't associate with them, Lisa!
Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-259=0850. If this "seems fishy" please report me to Obama's director of communication for health care reform at flag@whitehouse.gov. He can start positioning his laser satellite immediately. I'm the one wearing a camouflage shirt, red gym shorts, and gray Ecco running shoes.
See "Obama Adopts A Tactic He Has Criticized" from the liberal "Gainesville Sun" (Florida) page 7a,8/9/09.
Monday, August 10, 2009
Arguement #6 Liberals Are Morally Superior
Your liberal friend, Lisa, sniffs, "We Liberals care about the poor and the downtrodden. That's why we vote for programs that help people. You Republicans don't care. You have the philosophy of cavemen! It's just horrible the way you people behave!"
Your answer: "You couldn't be more wrong. Study after study has shown that Republicans give more money and time to charities than Democrats do. When you vote for social programs, you are voting to spend by force other people's money. Taking other people's money by force is stealing, and it is immoral. You claim government has no right to force a woman to have a baby because it is her body. You say government has no right to her body which I agree with. But then you turn around and say it is all right for government to force people to give up their money through taxation for social programs. Those people paying forced taxes have used their bodies, their lives, to accumulate that money. The government has no business taking their money just as the government has no business forcing a woman to carry a baby or whatever you demented people call him. So why the double standard? It's hypocrisy.
I've just shown you that you Liberals are stingy with your own money and time when it comes to the poor and are immoral and hypocritical in using force to take money away from one group to give it to another group. Why do you like being a Liberal, Lisa? I think you should consider that carefully.
If you do look carefully, you will see that everything a Liberal espouses is only cover for the fact that he wants the power to force you into unimagineable misery. Just look at Obama and his health "care." It's going to be the death sentence for us seniors! This is why Democrats are being caught in one lie after another. Just look at Pelosi and her lies that the CIA lied to her and the lie that loud, even disruptive health care dissent is "un-American."
Do you think she even knows that this country was founded by a loud, disruptive revolution against England? Being loud and disruptive is what Americans are. We are not tippy-toers! Did Pelosi rail against the Code Pinkers when they interrupted President Bush? No. More hypocrisy! The Liberal is addicted to the high he gets from forcing you into misery. Forcing you into misery is his drug. Liberal Lisa, you shouldn't want to be a part of that. Change, Baby, change!" Peter Nickerson at 352-359-0850.
Your answer: "You couldn't be more wrong. Study after study has shown that Republicans give more money and time to charities than Democrats do. When you vote for social programs, you are voting to spend by force other people's money. Taking other people's money by force is stealing, and it is immoral. You claim government has no right to force a woman to have a baby because it is her body. You say government has no right to her body which I agree with. But then you turn around and say it is all right for government to force people to give up their money through taxation for social programs. Those people paying forced taxes have used their bodies, their lives, to accumulate that money. The government has no business taking their money just as the government has no business forcing a woman to carry a baby or whatever you demented people call him. So why the double standard? It's hypocrisy.
I've just shown you that you Liberals are stingy with your own money and time when it comes to the poor and are immoral and hypocritical in using force to take money away from one group to give it to another group. Why do you like being a Liberal, Lisa? I think you should consider that carefully.
If you do look carefully, you will see that everything a Liberal espouses is only cover for the fact that he wants the power to force you into unimagineable misery. Just look at Obama and his health "care." It's going to be the death sentence for us seniors! This is why Democrats are being caught in one lie after another. Just look at Pelosi and her lies that the CIA lied to her and the lie that loud, even disruptive health care dissent is "un-American."
Do you think she even knows that this country was founded by a loud, disruptive revolution against England? Being loud and disruptive is what Americans are. We are not tippy-toers! Did Pelosi rail against the Code Pinkers when they interrupted President Bush? No. More hypocrisy! The Liberal is addicted to the high he gets from forcing you into misery. Forcing you into misery is his drug. Liberal Lisa, you shouldn't want to be a part of that. Change, Baby, change!" Peter Nickerson at 352-359-0850.
Friday, August 7, 2009
Arguement #5 The Rich Just Keep Getting Richer, And The Poorer
The arguement: The Liberal (or Communist, Marxist, Democrat, Fascist - collectivists all) pontificates to you: " We have to have federal intervention (force) into wages. Why, the rich are just getting richer, and the poor poorer! It's not fair!
Your Answer: "The amount of money you earn is usually always changing for the better. You earn barely enough to get by on when you are young and much more when you are older. In Thomas Sowell's book, 'Basic Economy,' he states that 'fewer than 3 percent in the bottom 20 percent of wage-earners in 1975 were still there in 1991. That means that in 16 years 97 percent of the wage-earners in the bottom 20 percent of wage-earners were no longer there, but had moved up. That is wonderful! But it even gets better:39 percent of the bottom 20 percent were in the top 20 percent of wage-earners by 1991. Just 16 years later! That is fantastic! The poor are definitely getting richer. Don't try to spread your misery on me. You really need to take a Paxil or Prozac, Liberal.
See "Basic Economics" by Thomas Sowell, page 137. Peter Nickerson at 352-359-0850.
Your Answer: "The amount of money you earn is usually always changing for the better. You earn barely enough to get by on when you are young and much more when you are older. In Thomas Sowell's book, 'Basic Economy,' he states that 'fewer than 3 percent in the bottom 20 percent of wage-earners in 1975 were still there in 1991. That means that in 16 years 97 percent of the wage-earners in the bottom 20 percent of wage-earners were no longer there, but had moved up. That is wonderful! But it even gets better:39 percent of the bottom 20 percent were in the top 20 percent of wage-earners by 1991. Just 16 years later! That is fantastic! The poor are definitely getting richer. Don't try to spread your misery on me. You really need to take a Paxil or Prozac, Liberal.
See "Basic Economics" by Thomas Sowell, page 137. Peter Nickerson at 352-359-0850.
Wednesday, August 5, 2009
Arguement #4 Socialized Medicine
The Liberal blithely says, " Socialized medicine is so wonderful! Why the British love theirs!"
How To Argue And Win: "If the British love their government medicine, they must be brain-dead! Recently, I read in the "Gainesville Sun" which as a member of the "New York Times" newspaper family is hardly concerned with the plight of the individual human being - that's you and I, by the way- that in England the emergency rooms cannot handle the cases coming in by ambulance. There is a law saying that anyone who comes into the emergency room must be seen within a certain amount of time. In order not to break that law, the hospital administrators are asking the ambulance drivers not to bring their patients in, but to park their ambulances around the hospital grounds and wait until the patient can be seen. Now there are so many ambulances parked around the hospitals that there are no ambulances available for other emergencies. Surely not even a Liberal could love that situation. Peter Nickerson at 352-359-0850.
How To Argue And Win: "If the British love their government medicine, they must be brain-dead! Recently, I read in the "Gainesville Sun" which as a member of the "New York Times" newspaper family is hardly concerned with the plight of the individual human being - that's you and I, by the way- that in England the emergency rooms cannot handle the cases coming in by ambulance. There is a law saying that anyone who comes into the emergency room must be seen within a certain amount of time. In order not to break that law, the hospital administrators are asking the ambulance drivers not to bring their patients in, but to park their ambulances around the hospital grounds and wait until the patient can be seen. Now there are so many ambulances parked around the hospitals that there are no ambulances available for other emergencies. Surely not even a Liberal could love that situation. Peter Nickerson at 352-359-0850.
Arguement #3 FDR's New Deal
The Liberal says, "President Obama is wisely using federal intervention to jump-start the economy just like FDR did during the Great Depression with the New Deal. We are so fortunate to have such a magnificent man at the helm now!"
How To Argue And Win: "Actually FDR did not initiate federal intervention into the economy, but his predecessor, President Hoover, did, beginning in 1929. FDR simply took over and expanded Hoover's policies. It was not until the United States entered World War II in 1941 that employment dropped. What happened? First, FDR said during one of his Fireside Chats over the radio that he had stopped being "Dr. New Deal" and had become "Dr. Win-The-War." He ceased his hostility toward business (Obama needs to pay attention) and became business-friendly. He offered business contracts to business that businesses could make handsome profits from, and he reduced the rate of deficit spending. He put 12 million people into full-time employment as soldiers in the Armed Forces. In short, he stopped putting so much money into dead-end government jobs and put money into the private sector, the one that produces goods and services. Then he became business-friendly." See Thomas Sowell's "The Housing Boom and Bust," especially pages 130-145 and 148.
How To Argue And Win: "Actually FDR did not initiate federal intervention into the economy, but his predecessor, President Hoover, did, beginning in 1929. FDR simply took over and expanded Hoover's policies. It was not until the United States entered World War II in 1941 that employment dropped. What happened? First, FDR said during one of his Fireside Chats over the radio that he had stopped being "Dr. New Deal" and had become "Dr. Win-The-War." He ceased his hostility toward business (Obama needs to pay attention) and became business-friendly. He offered business contracts to business that businesses could make handsome profits from, and he reduced the rate of deficit spending. He put 12 million people into full-time employment as soldiers in the Armed Forces. In short, he stopped putting so much money into dead-end government jobs and put money into the private sector, the one that produces goods and services. Then he became business-friendly." See Thomas Sowell's "The Housing Boom and Bust," especially pages 130-145 and 148.
Tuesday, August 4, 2009
Arguements #1 and #2 Competition And Gouging
Arguement One: The Liberal (Communist, Democrat, Socialist - collectivists all) sniffs, "We don't like competition, and don't allow our children to play games and sports where there are scores and winners and losers. We value peace and cooperation, and plan to teach our children the same. We're above competition. That's so old school!"
Answer: "Scarcity is a fact of life, and therefore you have no choice but to comptete in the adult world. It was only in the Garden Of Eden that man had everything and all he wanted. Now man must compete as resources are finite and can be used for many alternative uses. If you want to prepare your children for the real world of adult competition, you will have them enter into competitive activities.
See Thomas Sowell's "Basic Economics."
Arguement Two: The Liberal says, "I am so glad that our state has enacted anti-gouging laws during hurricanes so greedy hotel-owners and store-owners cant raise their prices during hurricanes. That's gouging, and it's despicable!"
Answer: This is not the blessing you think it is. As a nation of free people, you have the absolute of liberty. A free person has the right to his body. If he uses his body to own a motel that he wants to rent for $300 a night, that's his business. If he uses his body to offer $50 flashlights during hurricanes, that's his right. The liberal woman said it all when she said government had no right to her body, and if she wanted an abortion, she could have one as it was her body. Now it's time for you liberals to be consistent and not hypocrites. If it works for the woman wanting an abortion, it works for the man wanting $300 for a motel room during a hurricane.
In terms of economic cause and effects, if the motel owner can't raise his prices during hurricanes, the first people to arrive there may rent several rooms. One for the children, and one for the parents. But if the motel owner doubles or triples the price of a room, the families getting there first are not going to get a couple of rooms. They'll settle with one. This leaves a room available to other families taking refuge from the storm and brings about sharing that no one is even aware they are doing. See Thomas Sowell's "Basic Economics."
Answer: "Scarcity is a fact of life, and therefore you have no choice but to comptete in the adult world. It was only in the Garden Of Eden that man had everything and all he wanted. Now man must compete as resources are finite and can be used for many alternative uses. If you want to prepare your children for the real world of adult competition, you will have them enter into competitive activities.
See Thomas Sowell's "Basic Economics."
Arguement Two: The Liberal says, "I am so glad that our state has enacted anti-gouging laws during hurricanes so greedy hotel-owners and store-owners cant raise their prices during hurricanes. That's gouging, and it's despicable!"
Answer: This is not the blessing you think it is. As a nation of free people, you have the absolute of liberty. A free person has the right to his body. If he uses his body to own a motel that he wants to rent for $300 a night, that's his business. If he uses his body to offer $50 flashlights during hurricanes, that's his right. The liberal woman said it all when she said government had no right to her body, and if she wanted an abortion, she could have one as it was her body. Now it's time for you liberals to be consistent and not hypocrites. If it works for the woman wanting an abortion, it works for the man wanting $300 for a motel room during a hurricane.
In terms of economic cause and effects, if the motel owner can't raise his prices during hurricanes, the first people to arrive there may rent several rooms. One for the children, and one for the parents. But if the motel owner doubles or triples the price of a room, the families getting there first are not going to get a couple of rooms. They'll settle with one. This leaves a room available to other families taking refuge from the storm and brings about sharing that no one is even aware they are doing. See Thomas Sowell's "Basic Economics."
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)