Arguement #30 "There Are No Death Panels!"

There is a death panel provision in the Bacaus "health care" bill. It is that physicians will lose five percent (for now) of their salary if they provided more medical care that the limit set by the Almighty State for seniors. This will be the first time doctors have to ration their care to seniors and marks the beginning of seniors being treated like objects instead of human beings. If Obama will vote in Illinois to kill by neglect new-born babies born in spite of an abortion attempts, he wil move to kill old people who are even less useful to the State than newborns. Get your crosses out, Christians! Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850.

Arguement #29 "Obama Cares About Health Care"

Obama does not care about health care. If he did, he wouldn't be supporting socialized health care that in every nation that has it provides poor care and has forty percent of their hospitalized patients suffering from malnutrition. If Obama cared about health care, he would have talked about it in Masssachusetts. Why did he remain silent about socialized health care in a state that already has socialized health care? Because Masssachusett's socialized health care is costing about $1 billion dollars this year instead of the promised $150 million. Just a slight difference! He didn't not want the media focusing on socialized health care in Massachusetts because it has been a huge failure. What Obama cares about in health care is forcing you and me around and then when we are too old to be "useful" to the State, he is interested in using death panels to determine when we should be put to death. If Obama had cared about health care for individuals, he would not have vote to neglect babies born in Illinois in spite of abortion attempts and to ignore them until they died. This man does not care about your life or my life. He cares about his immediate family and making the State into a monster that kills "unwanted" babies and "useless" senior citizens. That is why I say that Christians might consider holding a cross between them and Obama if they ever find themselves in his presence. Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850.

Arguement #28 "Obama's Not Recognizing The Berlin Wal"

I've heard it twice today including once from a English Lord : Obama's not sending a delegation to represent the United States at the anniversary commemoration of the fall of the Berlin Wall. As the English Lord commented, "This says it all." But why would a communist celebrate the fall of the Berlin Wall? The fall of the wall meant that Communist Russia was no longer able to fence all its prisoners out of freedom. For years individuals had risked their lives going under and over the wall. If they failed, they were shot by the East German border guards. Indviduals would risk death - and most attempts ended in death - to escape the horrors of communism. Obama would hardly celebrate that. He wants America to be imprisoned in his communist state. He is busy destroying our economy to bring us to our knees. On our knees we will beg him to take care of us. He will take care of us. Just like he took care of the economy. I don't understand why people are not clutching a cross when they are in his presence! Are there no Chrisitans near him? Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850.

Arguement #27 "America Spends Too Much Money On Health Care!"

What is "too much money?" For you or for the patient getting care? Does he think too much money is being spent on him? If you were in the hospital, would you think too much money was being spent on you? Can't you see that is why every elite Democrat from Obama down is going to keep his special health insurance if nationalized health care is enacted? Obama and his gang of insane children do not plan to be treated by nationalized health care. They will keep their gold-plated health care. Yes, other developed countries with national health care do spend less than America, but the citizens don't get as good care. If they are elderly, they may get no care except for pain killers if they're lucky. Yes, these countries spend less money on health care than we do and so does Sudan. Want to go to any of these places for health care? Of course not! And the people in those places come to America for health care if they can afford it. What a silly arguement! Anyone knows that generally you get what you pay for. The more you pay, generally, the better you get. Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850.

Arguement #26 "There's No Rationing Of Drugs In Government Health Care."

No, there is rationing of drugs in nationalized health care. Britain has a government agency that limits people's acess to the latest and the most effective drugs. This government agency is, of course, named the opposite of what it does. It's called The National Institute For Health And Clinical Effectiveness. It is not interested in your health and clinical effectiveness; it is interested in saving the government money. The agency decides what drugs you don't get because they are too "expensive." This is rationing plain and simple. Between 1998 and 2002, we in the United States because of private heath care instead of public health care enjoyed 85 new drugs to help us with our physical and mental problems. Of those 85 new drugs, the people in Europe saw only 44 of them because of government health care. The Democrats are not ineterested in health care except as a vehicle to force you to march to their tunes even if it means misery and an early death. The Democrats don't care. It's about force over you not health care. They want to make a slave of you and kill you slowly. This is why the Swedes with their government medical care are so desperate that they go to veterinarians because doctors aren't allowed to see them. Don't let these insane children rule you. Oppose government health care as loudly as you can. Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850.

Arguement #25 People All Over The World Love Government-Run Health Care

Your response: "Then take a look at where the Italian Prime Minister, Silvio Berlusconi, went when he needed heart surgery. He went to the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio which is widely known to the best hospital in America for cardiac treatment. Remember all those wonderful "free" hospitals in Paris and London that Michael Moore rhapsodized about in his movie, "Sicko"? Did the good prime minister of Italy choose any of these government-run hospitals when he needed help? No, he chose an American non-government hospital. By non-governement, I mean he wouldn't have chosen a VA hospital either. Also when Canadian Parliament Member Belinda Stronach had breast cancer did she honor President Barack Obama's lie that "Canadians are perfectly happy with their health care"? No, she went to a California hospital. This was in 2007.
At the risk of Sally Pipes writing me that I am re-printing her book, let me cite her book, "The Top Ten Myths in American Health Care" again. See pages 137-8. Peter Nickerson at 352-359-0850.

Arguement 24 "Patients Undernourished In Government-Run Hospitals?

"I just can't believe that, Two-Guns! Obama wants us to follow in the foodsteps of government -run health care, and in Britain up to 40% of the patients in their hospitals receive such horrible care that they are actually undernourished! Who said that?"
"Lisa (the Liberal), I am glad that you are not just blankly accepting everything I say. I wish you would do the same with the lying Liberals. Yes, that statement was made by Britain's Malnutrition Advisory Group. Britain's government-run hospitals are in utter disrepair. To begin with ,each year the government cancels stops around 100,000 operations. About 100,000 people get illnesses and infections in government-run hospitals that they didn't come in with. Do you remember the heat wave in 2003 that killed 15,000 seniors in France? The reason that happened is that there wasn't room in the hospitals for them. Personally, I wonder if they weren't triaged out of the hospitals on the basis that they were a "drag" on society since they didn't work any more and pay taxes. I would like to know if that's the real reason they couldn't get into hospitals. See ,your family and friends love you, but the State looks upon you as either an asset in that you pay taxes to it or a liability in that you don't pay taxes. It's even worse if you're old, because that is when you have to see doctors a lot and therefore use up a lot of the Medicaid money. There's no love in government despite the snow jobs candidates for office give you when they're running for office. Just try to see and talk to them after they're elected. Why then they're royalty, and you're nothing but a dumb peasant. All you'll get from them is condescension. Talking about government treating you like a dumb peasant, in Sweden it's worse than that. People are getting treated like dogs."
"What do you mean?" asks Lisa. "Surely you're not being literal!"
"Actually I am. In Sweden, the government-run health care is so horrible and the waits so long, that desperate people have gone to veterinarians for medical care. Swedes needing heart surgery have to wait as long as 25 weeks for heart surgery. That's six months, Lisa. In non-government hospitals here in America, I've heard of doctors finding something wrong with the heart of a patient at their private offices and driving the patient themselves to the hospital for immediate heart surgery."
"Where are you getting all your facts from, Two-Guns?"
"Most of them come from Sally Pipes' book, "The Top Ten Myths In American Health Care."That reminds me, did I make it clear yesterday that the liberals who are slavers are simply projecting onto Rush Limbaugh their own slavery? They don't want to admit to us dumb peasants that they are trying to enslave us by creating laws that will force us to do as they want us to do in every aspect of our life. So they say that Rush Limbaugh supports slavery- not them, of course. Like I say - lying Liberals."
"You make it very difficult for me to be a Liberal, Two-Guns."
"Lisa, you are living proof that Liberals are irrational."
Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850.

Arguement 23 "Rush Limbaugh Supports Slavery?"

The Liberal position: " Two-Guns, did you hear that Rush Limbaugh was accused of supporting slavery and therefore shouldn't be eligible to buy the Rams? I know you listen to him all the time."
The Ayn Rand, Liberterian, Conservative Republican reply: " Yeah Lisa, I heard about it, and except for the lying viciousness of it, I find it amusing in a detached way. The first defense mechanism of collectivists or Liberals is lying. That's why I refer to them as lying Liberals often.
But not as often as they lie. The second defense mechanism Liberals use is projection. Calling Rush a slaver is projection. Projection is when you have something inside you that you are uncomfortable with so you place or project it upon others and then attack it there. On others, not yourself. You know that I make it clear that what Liberals and all collectivists want is the ability to use force on you to make you do the things they want you to do, not what you want to do. What Liberals and all collectivists want is slavery for everyone except themselves, of course.
A couple of days ago, I heard someone calling into a major talk show host and telling him, Neal Boortz it was, that someone important has used the term "force" to explain what the Obama Administration was using on us. Neal said he was heartened to hear that as that is his major criticism of political parties but especially the Democrats - they use force through the laws passed to make individuals do things they don't want to and shouldn't have to. The liberals know that more people are seeing through their game and fear they will eventually realize that they are modern day slavers. They don't use the whip, but laws to force you and me around and make us work for free because more and more of our money is being taken by the government through taxes and given to "more deserving" people.

Arguement 22: " You Lie, Michelle Obama, Again?"

The Liberal Position: "What do you mean Michelle Obama lied again about health care? Are you on the side of terrorists like some of the Democrats in the news are asking Republicans?'
The Ayn Rand, Liberterian, Conservative Republican Answer: "No, Lisa, my Liberal friend, telling you a fact about Michelle Obama is not being on the side of the terrorists. The terrorists lie. In fact, there is a Muslim term, for lying on behalf of Islam. Christianity has no such perversion. Islam is an imperialistic religion. Christianity is not. The Obamas are far more on the side of terrorists than I am because the Obamas would never say what I have just said about Islam. I have been telling you that the Liberal Democrats are evil-sick, and it's time you began believing me as I have been piling up examples. I'm beginning to wonder if you only have a primitive mind that uses only emotions. You are supposed to have a logical mind on top of your primitive mind. Maybe you never grew one like the Liberal Democrats."
"But Two-Guns, how can you say such a hateful thing about Michelle Obama - that she lied about health care?"
"Because it is true, Grasshopper. "
"How's that?"
"That's bettter. I will tell you. Michelle Obama used to work for the very hospital she took her daughter Sasha to . She was on unpaid leave during the campaign from that hospital during her husband's presidential campaign, and I don't know what her status is with that hospital now that she is in the White House. But do you know what her job was at that hospital in Chicago?"
"No, what?"
"Her job was to legally find a way to turn uninsured people away from the hospital emergency center. These were probably mainly poor people who had no money either."
" She worked to turn the uninsured away from medical care?"
"Yes. Instead of letting them get the best medical care around at the hospital emergency room, she devised a way to make them go to Medicaid mills, clinics, and other hospitals."
"How could she justify such a horrible thing?"
" She publicly justified it by saying that the hospital wanted to concentrate on serious illnesses such as cancer. Any hospital could say that."
"I can't believe it! My feeling brain is overwhelmed with emotions!"
"Hang in there, Lisa, the Liberal! When Michelle Obama gets the chance to make some big bucks, she'll turn people away from top drawer medical care. When Michelle Obama gets the chance to gain the power to force people to receive low-grade medical care through nationalized medical care, she's all about the poor and uninsured getting medical care. But she doesn't tell them that it's poor medical care, and that she's not going to be a part of it. She'll have a different kind of medical care as the President's wife for the rest of her life. She talks out of both sides of
her mouth. She does not care about people. She cares about forcing people to do whatever she wants them to do. She forces them through laws that the corrupt, evil-sick Liberal Democrats in the Senate and the House don't even read before they vote for them. Peter Nickerson MS, MSW at 352-359-0850. PS. The shunting of uninsured people away from the Chicago hospital emergency room was done at the University of Chicago Medical Center. The process of turning uninsured people away was gloriously called the Urban Health Initiative. It began in 2007.