Arguement: Your liberal friend, Lisa, exclaims, "It's my body! I have the right to get an abortion if I want to. The government has not right to tell me what I can and can not do with my body!"
Answer: Lisa, on this issue you and I agree. I will however use your words against you because what you believe as a liberal except for your stand on abortion is usually contrary to the arguement you are making here. That is why I say that liberals are sick: they are not in contact with reality and contradict themselves consequently.
Yes, it is your body, and government which I define as pompous politicians and their brown-shirt enforcers has no right to tell you what you can do with your body. You are a free person, not the slave of the state. The state has no claim on how you use your body. It cannot force you to carry a baby to delivery. But I demand consistency from you or I'll have to tell you that you are being a hypocrite. You're saying that the government has no right to what your body produces. I agree and add that it applies to more than a baby. You can use your body in many ways to produce many things. A prostitute uses her body to produce money. The whore has a right to the fruits of her labor: money or whatever she is given in exchage for the service of her body. The rocket scientist has a perfect right to the fruits of the labor of his body which comes mainly from using his head. The state has no right to make you grow a baby, and if you do deliver a baby, the state has no right to that baby. Likewise the state has no right to other things that you use your body to produce.
I consider it a necessary evil that we have to pay taxes for such things as police, firemen, and national defense. Such things are necessary for each individual's self-protection which is the only legitimate function of goverment. A proper government acts only as an agent of man's self-protection. A proper government does not force you to use a part of your life to pay for a part of another man or woman's life. A proper government does not take your money and distribute it to others. That is slavery, and supposedly that was outlawed in America. It is one of life's ironies that American blacks with slave blood in them and so righteous about the evilness of slavery done to their ancestors are for the most part Liberal Democrats who want to force financially productive people to give up a portion of their money to those who are financially less productive, mainly, in race ratios, blacks and Hispanics. That is slavery.
I abhor abortions. An abortion kills an innocent baby. There is a simple, honorable answer to not wanting to raise a child: adoption. I will agree that there needs to be more incentives to adoption because for too many children are being killed in abortions. Governement has created a lack of incentives by outlawing payments by adoptive parents for a child. If a mother were able to sell her child to adoptive parents approved by social services and reviewed by the court, I am certain that there would be far fewer babies being aborted. What is less bad - selling a baby or killing a baby? This is not a perfect world and selling your baby through an adoption process would be far better than killing her through an abortion. Do I make myself clear? Peter Nickerson, MS, MSW at 352-359-0850.
Friday, September 4, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment